Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit

Article View: adobe.audition.windows

Article #2754

Back to adobe.audition.windows Previous Next

#2754

From: Vincent_Z
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:59

1 lines
1077 bytes

Well, here's the deal. I'm using Ozone to master audio in Audition. In the Ozone guide, it mentions ANY kind of mastering to audio should be applied with the audio in the HIGHEST quality possible, which is probably 96000/32 in Audition (?). This way, you're supposed to get a 'crispier' signal after processing due to the extra bits you've generated with upsampling. While this sounds reasonable in theory, I still can't hear a major difference, or perhaps any at all! One thing I know 96000/32 is great for is noise reduction.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bbb890e.4@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

References: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,133149ba8d85d9c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Vincent_Z@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows
Subject: Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit
Message-ID: <3bbb890e.4@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:59:56 -0700
References: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

Reply to Parent Message