🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: adobe.audition.windows
Article #2755

Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit

#2755
From: Ozpeter
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:33
3 lines
1210 bytes
Maybe they are just meaning that you shouldn't reduce downwards before mastering - so if you signal started off 24/96, keep it that way till all processing is done - but they probably don't mean to convert it to 96kHz first.

As I've said before, the chances of anyone hearing your recording and saying "but it would have been so much better if you'd worked in 24/96 'cos I can hear that you didn't" are close to zero. They are far more likely to say that you used the wrong mic in the wrong place. The practical advantage of working in 32 bits of course I do concede.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3bbb890e.5@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webx
References: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,133149ba8d85d9c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Ozpeter@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows
Subject: Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit
Message-ID: <3bbb890e.5@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:33:40 -0700
References: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webx