Re: So is the photography forum dead or grasping for its last breath?

Article View: adobe.photography

Article #583

#583

From: Ram�n_G_Casta�eda
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:02

1 lines
722 bytes

Even weaker is Adobe's case when they unilaterally change the TOU six years or more after I joined.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b85a13.59@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,df98f10b5350a14c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Ram�n_G_Casta�eda@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: So is the photography forum dead or
 grasping for its last breath?
Message-ID: <59b85a13.59@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:02:09 -0700
References: <59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message