Re: Ripping postscript vs ripping PDF

Article View: adobe.postscript.programming

Article #631

Back to adobe.postscript.programming Previous Next

#631

From: Current_Point
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 02:16

7 lines
1085 bytes

I've been struggling with this issue also. I want to send PDF data to the RIP in order to preserve transparency as late as possible, but then I loose the setpagedevice functionality found in PostScript.

I guess those parameters can be handled in a JDF workflow, but setpagedevice is just too easy and efficient to give up. I think I'll flatten upstream and stick with ripping PostScript.

Any input on this would be greatly appreciated

Rik

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2cd0159e.1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2cd0159e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10c61a,835e20942cbceffa
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c61a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-17 18:37:51 PST
From: Current_Point@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.postscript.programming
Subject: Re: Ripping postscript vs ripping PDF
Message-ID: <2cd0159e.1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:16:25 -0800
References: <2cd0159e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message