Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #15817Re: AS-2.0.2-Horizontal Scaling of Text
From: Shane_Stanley
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 02:34
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 02:34
14 lines
1236 bytes
1236 bytes
On Nov 6, 2003, at 12:37 PM, Peter Truskier wrote: > assumed that your more terse approach would also be more efficient, > but it seems that the repeat loop I posted in msg. 11 is actually > faster I'm surprised that there'd be much difference either way. Could the difference be that, in the latest code you posted you're reducing by 10% each time (a factor of .9), whereas my sample and your earlier code reduced it by only 1% (a factor of .99)? -- Shane Stanley <sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<D053CBF6-1001-11D8-A993-003065D61B90@myriad-com.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webxReferences:
<2cce3956.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f939a,c53fbda946236634 X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-05 18:37:52 PST From: Shane_Stanley@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Re: AS-2.0.2-Horizontal Scaling of Text Message-ID: <D053CBF6-1001-11D8-A993-003065D61B90@myriad-com.com.au> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:34:58 -0800 References: <2cce3956.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit