Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign
Article #15818Re: AS-2.0.2-Horizontal Scaling of Text
From: Peter_Truskier
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 03:08
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 03:08
14 lines
1014 bytes
1014 bytes
Could the difference be that, in the latest code you posted you're reducing
by
10% each time (a factor of .9), whereas my sample and your earlier code
reduced it by only 1% (a factor of .99)?
Doh! Of course, that was it. With the same factor, the terse version is about 4X faster...
Time for a break ;->
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2cce3956.13@webx.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webxReferences:
<2cce3956.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f939a,c53fbda946236634 X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-05 19:37:48 PST From: Peter_Truskier@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign Subject: Re: AS-2.0.2-Horizontal Scaling of Text Message-ID: <2cce3956.13@webx.la2eafNXanI> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:08:30 -0800 References: <2cce3956.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit