Re: Complicated workflow appropriate for AS solution?

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign

Article #9215

Back to adobe.scripting.indesign Previous Next

#9215

From: Shane_Stanley
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:06

9 lines
1420 bytes

On 6/9/06 6:30 AM, "asardar" <member@adobeforums.com> wrote:

> Can the workflow below be AppleScripted?

Yes, although you would probably approach it differently, doing more of the
work in ID rather than Acrobat.

-- 
Shane Stanley <sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C1243FFE.2F6B5%sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!news.buerger.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing

References: <3bc189f9.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f939a,581a08f782f22c51
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Shane_Stanley@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!news.buerger.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: Complicated workflow appropriate for AS solution?
Message-ID: <C1243FFE.2F6B5%sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:06:06 -0700
References: <3bc189f9.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 12
Received: from bld-mail03.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.67] by adobeforums.com; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:06:11 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unverified [59.167.87.226])  by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.2f) with ESMTP id 25473272  for <adobe.scripting.indesign@adobeforums.com>; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:36:09 +0930 (CST)
Return-Path: <sstanley@myriad-com.com.au>
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
Thread-Topic: Complicated workflow appropriate for AS solution?
Thread-Index: AcbRP92+HAHWMj0zEduPoQARJHm3nA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message