Re: Complicated workflow appropriate for AS solution?

Article View: adobe.scripting.indesign

Article #9216

Back to adobe.scripting.indesign Previous Next

#9216

From: asardar
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:11

1 lines
844 bytes

I'd probably prefer that anyway. What workflow approach would you suggest? Thanks in advance.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bc189f9.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!news.motzarella.org!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing

References: <3bc189f9.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f939a,581a08f782f22c51
X-Google-Attributes: gidf939a,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: asardar@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!multikabel.net!feed20.multikabel.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!news.motzarella.org!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.scripting.indesign
Subject: Re: Complicated workflow appropriate for AS solution?
Message-ID: <3bc189f9.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 16:11:31 -0700
References: <3bc189f9.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message