Article View: adobe.typography
Article #401Re: Modern yet conservative font
From: Phyllis_Utter
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:33
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:33
5 lines
1048 bytes
1048 bytes
BTW I often think of sans-serif fonts as looking more "modern" than serif fonts. The serif fonts just have a more traditional feel to me. Is that a skewed perspective? Hard to tell exactly where I picked up on that idea. The actual age of a font doesn't matter much to me. If it works anything like fashion, old styles can quickly become the modern look again. :) But of course the highly decorative stuff would suggest specific eras. Phyllis
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b709a5.7@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news4us.nl!webcrossingReferences:
<59b709a5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1042b6,eb126a59de744e75 X-Google-Attributes: gid1042b6,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Phyllis_Utter@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.typography Subject: Re: Modern yet conservative font Message-ID: <59b709a5.7@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:33:46 -0800 References: <59b709a5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news4us.nl!webcrossing