Article View: ak.general
Article #2107Re: VOTE: Sleaziest Presidents of U.S. History.
From: Chuck Buckley
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 1996 00:00
55 lines
3719 bytes
3719 bytes
In article <327fa4d2.18280243@news.okstate.edu>, Bradley Kent <kbradle@math.okstate.edu> wrote: >On Wed, 06 Nov 1996 12:17:37 -0800, james berry <james.berry@sematech.org> >wrote: > >>Jim wrote: >>> >>> Steve Crisp wrote: >>> > >>> > Blyden Potts wrote: >>> > > >>> > > In the spirit of the election it might be fun to have people offer "votes" on who >>> > > they believe were the five sleaziest Presidents in U.S. history. Please provide the >>> > > names of your candidates, a ranked order, and brief reasons they should be considered. >>> > > If you like, we can also recognize a distinction between being personally sleazy and >>> > > having a corrupt or sleazy administration. Reply with your vote. > >He got 50% percent of the vote compared to Dole's %41. No lanside like the >more that 100 newspapers that support Clinton are touting. He made need to >bone up on history, but you need to tune into current events. The original >poster only cracked the surface on the many truths reported quitely in the >news regarding Clinton. > Clinton/Gore 45,599,094 50% Dole/Kemp 37,842,270 41% Perot/Choate 7,866,627 9% 1980 results: Ronald Reagan 43,899,248 Carter 35,481,435 Anderson 5,719,437 Basically, if you consider Reagan's win in 1980 to be a landslide, then Clinton's was a landslide also. They won by about the same number of votes and with about the same percentages. Heck.. *more* people voted for Clinton than voted for Reagan. There is a basic difference tho. In 1980, Reagan could claim that he was elected as part of a mandate considering he was part of a wave of people elected that year. There was no such mandate this year. If anything, the voting reflected a deep resentment of both sides. The country voted *for* a gridlock situation for the next 4 years. -- Charles Buckley | I took a multiple choice test once: cbuckley@swttools.fc.hp.com | I checked "All of the Above"... (970) 229-7607 | "None of the Above".. I definately do not speak for HP | Then I set the test on fire
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<55r9rq$n66@fcnews.fc.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<54eqfm$332@news.internetmci.com> <3280C1F5.61AE@geocities.com> <3280F261.46@sematech.org> <327fa4d2.18280243@news.okstate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ce2c,14f0b81757e31926 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ce2c,public X-Google-Thread: f6e0e,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gidf6e0e,public X-Google-Thread: fbf1a,14f0b81757e31926 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbf1a,public X-Google-Thread: 115d61,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gid115d61,public X-Google-Thread: f7d58,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gidf7d58,public X-Google-Thread: 100eae,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gid100eae,public X-Google-Thread: 105e42,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gid105e42,public X-Google-Thread: fab07,e4506ffe12f9682a X-Google-Attributes: gidfab07,public From: cbuckley@fc.hp.com (Chuck Buckley) Subject: Re: VOTE: Sleaziest Presidents of U.S. History. Date: 1996/11/07 Message-ID: <55r9rq$n66@fcnews.fc.hp.com> X-Deja-AN: 194971151 references: <54eqfm$332@news.internetmci.com> <3280C1F5.61AE@geocities.com> <3280F261.46@sematech.org> <327fa4d2.18280243@news.okstate.edu> organization: Hewlett-Packard newsgroups: ak.general,alabama.general,alt.flame,alt.fan.karl-malden.nose,aol.neighborhood.az.phoenix.general,aol.neighborhood.il.chicago.general,aol.neighborhood.in.indianapolis.general,aol.neighborhood.ny.general,aol.neighborhood.ny.new-york.general,atl.general,austin.general,az.general,ba.general,ca.general,co.cos.general,co.fort-collins.general,co.general,compuserve.general,dc.general,delaware.general,dfw.general,fl.general,houston.general,il.general,kc.general,ky.general,la.general,lex.general,md.gene