🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:40:41 -0500, Rôgêr wrote:

> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:04:38 -0500, Rôgêr wrote:
>> 
>>> richard wrote:
>>>> Snopes.com seems to think that one page of advertising isn't enough.
>>>> When ever you go there, you maybe get one, somestime two other pages
>>>> of advertising to load.
>>>>
>>>> What's even worse is, some sites I've been to lately insist on adding
>>>> on ads on top of their site you can't click close no how no way. When
>>>> you click on them, you get another page you want nothing to do with.
> 
>>> I just went to snopes and viewed several pages, not one of which was
>>> an advertisement. Do you know how to check your computer for
>>> spyware/trojans/viruses?
>> 
>> I just went to snopes and got several blocked popup warnings from
>> Firefox, plus I saw several unblocked ads for "shocking photos" of
>> flabby women. I use linux. Do you know how to check your skull for a
>> brain?
> 
> It isn't me having trouble configuring a browser. It was totally clean
> for me at snopes.

It's you who doesn't have the brains required to divorce the idea that 
you may have configured your browser from the idea that 'therefore 
everyone else who gets ads must have spyware, trojans or viruses.'

I'd ask you how feels to be looking so stupid right now, but truthfully, 
I doubt you even have the brains to realise that you do indeed look 
really stupid.