🚀 go-pugleaf

"ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:459707d0$0$6293$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> honestjohn wrote:
> > "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:45907175$0$25973$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> >> honestjohn wrote:
> >> > "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:458faaa0$0$25963$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> >> >> Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> >> > ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >> >> > news:455915a4$0$25959$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> >> >>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >> >> >>> news:45550be4$0$25928$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >> >> >>>>> news:4553b33f$0$25960$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >> >> >>>>>>> news:454d1536$1$25954$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com:
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Phil Kyle wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> verbally sodomised  in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> news:453ad37f$0$15892$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Real Friendit Naybourhood Wote Monger wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
news:45342108$0$15888$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Free Speech wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
news:4531d1ba$0$15908$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:59:18 -0500, "honestjohn"
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <honestjohn@centurytel.net>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"http://www.infowars.com/" <truth@r.us> wrote in
> > message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:8p5rg25son1qrqoqbmfje2spdiro2fc16k@4ax.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:40:17 -0500, "honestjohn"
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><honestjohn@centurytel.net>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >"Art Deco" <erfc@netcabal.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >news:170920060905418868%erfc@netcabal.com...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Double-A <double-aa@hush.ai> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >http://www.infowars.com/ wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:41:53 -0400, ah
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> <splifingate@gmail.com>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>Art Deco wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>Holly wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/11277554/modern
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >_t im es
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Hi Alexa!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>fiat money
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>Taking recipes for roasted gold bullion.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Everyone is a terrorist suspect in the USA
> > now.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >:))))
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >The Meta Game:  US Response to losing
control
> > to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >technological
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >advancement
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >By Ryan Singel| Also by this reporter
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >15:30 PM Sep, 13, 2006
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >A bill radically redefining and expanding
the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >government's ability
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >eavesdrop and search the houses of U.S.
> > citizens
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >without court
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >approval
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >passed a key Senate committee Wednesday,
and
> > may
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >be voted on by
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >full
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Senate as early as next week.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >By a 10-8 vote, the Senate Judiciary
Committee
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >approved SB2453,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >National
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Security Surveillance Act (.pdf), which was
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >co-written by
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>committee's
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >chairman Sen. Arlen Specter
(R-Pennsylvania)
> > in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >concert with the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>White
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >House.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >The committee also passed two other
> > surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >measures,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>including
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >one
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California),
one
> > of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the few senators
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >briefed on the National Security Agency
> > program.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Feinstein's bill,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >which
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Specter co-sponsored before submitting
another
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >bill, rebuffs the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >administration's legal arguments and all
but
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >declares the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>warrantless
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >wiretapping illegal.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >In contrast, Specter's bill concedes the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >government's right to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wiretap
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Americans without warrants, and allows the
> > U.S.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Attorney General
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >authorize, on his own, dragnet surveillance
of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Americans so long
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >stated purpose of the surveillance is to
> > monitor
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >suspected
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>terrorists
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >or
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >spies.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Lisa Graves, senior legislative counsel for
> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >American Civil
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Liberties
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Union, called the bill "stunning."
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >"The administration has taken their illegal
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >conduct in wiretapping
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Americans
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >without court orders, in violation of the
> > Foreign
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Intelligence
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Act and the Constitution, and used it as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >springboard to not only
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>get
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >FISA
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >changed to allow the Terrorist Surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Program, but to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>actually,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >going
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >forward, not give protections to Americans'
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >privacy rights," Graves
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >said.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Jim Dempsey, the policy director for the
more
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >moderate Center for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Democracy
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >and Technology, described the bill's
passage
> > out
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >of committee as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >"light
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >years or miles beyond the Patriot Act."
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >"What started out as Sen. Specter wanting
to
> > rein
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >in the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>president's
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >program
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >has turned on its head and is now not just
a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >legislative
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ratification
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >of the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >program, but an expansion of warrantless
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >wiretapping of Americans,"
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Dempsey
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >said. "It would allow the NSA to turn its
> > vacuum
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >cleaners on even
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >domestic
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >phone calls and e-mails of citizens.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >"They do all of this in Alice in Wonderland
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >fashion by defining
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >all
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >kinds of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >categories of surveillance to be not
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >surveillance," said Dempsey.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Specter, who called NSA's warrantless
> >> > surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >a "festering
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sore
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >on our
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >body politic," champions his bill, since it
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >allows, but does nor
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >require,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the administration to submit the whole
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >surveillance program to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>review
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >by a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >secretive court. Specter says President
Bush
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >promised to submit
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >NSA
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >program to the court, if the bill passes.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >The bill also strikes from U.S. law a
> > requirement
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >that all
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >surveillance of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >suspected spies and terrorists be done in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >accordance with FISA.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >But
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>an
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >aide
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >for Specter disputes that this radically
> > changes
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >FISA or the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>balance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >powers: Specter considers this to be an
update
> > to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >FISA that moves
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >law
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >toward where technology is now, according
to
> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >aide, who spoke
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >background.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Bush has acknowledged the NSA program
monitors
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Americans'
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >international
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >phone calls and e-mails without court
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >authorization, but says the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >program
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >only targets communications where one side
or
> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >other has
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>suspected
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >terrorist connections.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Feinstein says her briefings lead her to
> > believe
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the current system
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >needs
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >only minor changes, such as increasing the
> > number
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >of judges that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>issue
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >warrants.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >"I have been briefed on the
> >> > terrorist-surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >program, and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >I
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >come
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to believe that this surveillance can be
done,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >without sacrifice
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >our
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >national security, through court-issued
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >individualized warrants
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >content
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >collection on U.S. persons under the FISA
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >process," Feinstein said
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Wednesday
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >in a press release.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >That program has recently been declared
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >unconstitutional by a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>federal
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >judge
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >in Detroit, and is being challenged by more
> > than
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >20 lawsuits across
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >country.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >The bill:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Redefines surveillance so that only
programs
> > that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >catch the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>substance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >of a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >communication need oversight. Any
government
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >surveillance that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >captures,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >analyzes and stores patterns of
communications
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >such as phone
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>records,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >or
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >e-mail and website addresses, is no longer
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >considered surveillance.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Expands the section of law that allows the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >attorney general to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >authorize
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >spying on foreign embassies, so long as
> > there's
> >> > no
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >"substantial
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >likelihood"
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >that an American's communication would be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >captured. Repeals the provision of federal
law
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >that allows the government
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >unfettered
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >wiretapping and physical searches without
> >> > warrants
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >or notification
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >15
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >days after a declaration of war. The lack
of
> > any
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >congressional
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >restraint on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the president's wartime powers arguably
puts
> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >president at the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >height,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >rather than the ebb, of his powers in any
time
> > of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >war, even an
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >undeclared
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >one.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Repeals the provision of federal law that
> > limits
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the government's
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >wartime
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >powers to conduct warrantless wiretapping
and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >physical searches
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >period
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >of 15 days after a declaration of war.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Repeals the provision of federal law that
puts
> > a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >time limit on the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >government's wartime powers to conduct
> >> > warrantless
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >wiretapping and
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >physical
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >searches against Americans. Under current
law,
> >> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >president has
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >power
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >for only 15 days following a declaration of
> > war.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Allows the attorney general, or anyone he
or
> > she
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >designates, to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >authorize
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >widespread domestic spying, such as
monitoring
> >> > all
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>instant-messaging
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >systems
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >in the country, so long as the government
> >> > promises
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to delete anythi
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ng
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >not
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >terrorism-related.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Moves all court challenges to the NSA
> >> > surveillance
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >program to a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >secretive
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >court in Washington, D.C., comprised of
judges
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >appointed by the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chief
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Justice of the Supreme Court. Only
government
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >lawyers would be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>allowed
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >in
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the courtroom.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Allows the government to get warrants for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >surveillance programs
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >as
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >whole,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >instead of having to describe to a judge
the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >particular persons
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>be
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >monitored and the methods to be used.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >A markup of the corresponding House bill,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >sponsored by Rep. Heather
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Wilson
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >(R-New Mexico) was scheduled for Wednesday,
> > but
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >was canceled.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >Specter has moved to have his bill voted
upon
> >> > next
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >week by voice
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>vote,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >called a unanimous consent motion,
according
> > to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >the ACLU's Graves.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Such a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >procedure would leave no record of who
voted
> > for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >or against the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bill.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >>http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1%2C71778-0.ht
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >ml
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Humm, lessee....
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Top ten Reasons Why Any Idiot Would
Volunteer
> > To
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Live In A Fascist
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Dictatorship:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 10.  1.2 children allowed
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 9.  Minimum wage is $5.25 per hour,  just
> > enough
> >> > to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> buy a gallon
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>gas
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> after taxes.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 8.  Sending your children to be murdered in
> > wars
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> for oil in the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>middle
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >east
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 7.  Spending 250k for a college education,
only
> > to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> find you're on
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >hit
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> list as an intellectual who is smarter than
the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> entire US government
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 6.  Spending 450K for an apartment owned by
a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> European bank who is
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >backing
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> your hard earned money with hegemony gained
> > from
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> financing your
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>house
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 5.  Everyone has a microwave and financed
car
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 4.  You get to pay 3/5 of your annual salary
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> funding the US
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>treasury,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >which
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> is bankrupt
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 3.  Democracy means they want you to prop up
> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> entire economy
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>buying
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> trinkets made in China
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 2.  Peace is a treasonable offense
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> <drum roll, maestro!>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 1.  If you don't go along with the above
plan
> > for
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> the New American
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Century
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> of Glory and Flag Waving, you get to spend
all
> > of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> eternity in one
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Dickie's Concentration Camps, with 3 hots
and a
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> cot, like the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Katrina
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> victims.  Though it's looking more like they
> > just
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> gave them a tent
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>next
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >to
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> The Local Exxon Station.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> And....
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 0.  Queen Beatrix and Queen Elizabeth are
out
> > of
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> oil.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >Did you realize you are smamming to 10
different
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >goups?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >You should get WebTV.  That will clip them
right
> >> > off!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >Double-A
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi, saucerhead!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >Hi, Most mentally retarded Alpine Nazi Goat
Humper!
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To participate or to comment, contact Carl
Osterwald,
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> National Renewable
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Energy Lab, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401-3393
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (303/384-6764; fax:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 303/384-6790).
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email:
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carl_osterwald@nrel.gov
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.astm.org/SNEWS/FEBRUARY_2000/solar.html
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>YES...YES...YES...
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't you feel, well, encouraged knowing your
> > alternative
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> energy needs are
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being met by a front operation for the CIA which
psyops
> >> > the
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> internet instead
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of actually planning for the loss of oil?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-ob.htm
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Especially considering you've been duped by people
> > vastly
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more knowledgeable
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than YOU.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really, kiddies.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexa.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shim Skirtvan is a grandchild of Rothchild. And you
will
> > die
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> eventually.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> When I do, at least I will have the comfort of knowing
my
> > 1/4
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> acre lot on the Shore of Lake Ozark will be evenly
> >> > distributed
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> amongst my children.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hiah, Who did you think you were saying hello to?
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> My future.
> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello
> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>>> Hello
> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>> I don't know why
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> I sold the Dodge
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> Cos it was Dodgey.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> I mis-took it as a Ram, and blundered the entire deal.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> So it had terrible ramifications?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You'll have to ask the other drivers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can dead people speak?
> >> >>
> >> >> Sure.
> >> >>
> >> > "ah" is proof of that!
> >>
> >> You have no idea, Boy.
> >>
> > Glad to see you "came back" for just one more jab.
>
> I was in my Cups.
>
"C" cups, dad you've been taking the wrong hormones!

HJ