Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #188Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: John Navas
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:48
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:48
33 lines
2959 bytes
2959 bytes
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:25:07 -0500, in <m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com>, Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:40:21 GMT, sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye) >wrote: > >>jcdill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>There was cell service AND WiFi internet signal at Black Rock City in >>>2009. >> >>They've had Internet for at least 6 years, but the cell service is a new >>thing. Does this mean that some enterprising cell company brings in portable >>cell sites? Otherwise I couldn't think of how else they'd do it. It's way >>too far to get a signal in and out of Gerlach or Empire I'd think. > >I still haven't figured out why you have such an objection to cell >towers. To me, they aren't nearly as objectionable as the golden >arches of McDonald's, for example. We prohibit those (the big ones) too. >In fact, I'd take a standard tower >with panel antennas over a fake tree any day. Did you have a bad >experience with a cell tower at some point? All the time -- butt ugly. -- John "We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<akl65697de38rbseg71jitd09sutr4fm8v@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.84.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com> <i2uc5i$t96$3@news.eternal-september.org> <i2ut4q$a1k$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2vgs5$q4u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.84.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed-fusi2.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:48:20 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <akl65697de38rbseg71jitd09sutr4fm8v@4ax.com> References: <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com> <i2uc5i$t96$3@news.eternal-september.org> <i2ut4q$a1k$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2vgs5$q4u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA"; logging-data="4236"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/cFIM+2nsV5+lSlhS0+0pS" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Cancel-Lock: sha1:81Gp2ldRxb0hDl388upjvr6fMYY=