🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #189

Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

#189
From: John Navas
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:49
66 lines
4503 bytes
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:18:03 -0700, in
<rnu55651esmbuk9a51ebgu51vl043dn6fl@4ax.com>, DevilsPGD
<Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> wrote:

>In message <daf4565na6ianj22krurgusdul3vq881s9@4ax.com> John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:19:05 -0700, in
>><2q4456h5erv7jfegqt0154vtb0uqblfh7g@4ax.com>, DevilsPGD
>><Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> wrote:
>>
>>>In message <nj3456praioq3mlij37c4bcst6i8n0d6i3@4ax.com> John Navas
>>><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:26:13 -0700, in
>>>><1fj3565k3evc6jje3ij8shhfkftbgp6et6@4ax.com>, DevilsPGD
>>>><Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage@crazyhat.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In message <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com> John Navas
>>>>><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:41:02 -0700, in
>>>>>><4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, SMS
>>>>>><scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>David Kaye wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah, I know that it's nice to have good cell coverage, but the antennas are 
>>>>>>>> unsightly.  Especially in a city such as SF where people are proud of the 
>>>>>>>> architecture and the views, hanging antennas on the sides of buildings makes 
>>>>>>>> them really really ugly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I was at a meeting where T-Mobile was given approval for a rooftop 
>>>>>>>antenna with the only caveat being that they had to shield the equipment 
>>>>>>>(not the tower) from view from the nearby neighborhood. They refused.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The early carriers (who eventually morphed into Verizon and AT&T) have 
>>>>>>>the advantage of having been able to install lots of towers before 
>>>>>>>neighborhoods realized what was happening, in addition to the advantage 
>>>>>>>of being on 800 MHz not 1900 MHz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There is no such advantage, as the citations I've posted make clear.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're saying that all other things being equal, a 800MHz signal and
>>>>>a 1900MHz signal will penetrate typical buildings and other structures
>>>>>equally?
>>>>
>>>>Read the cited references.
>>>
>>>You didn't cite any... 
>>
>>I did.  Do keep up.  Otherwise, "Google is your friend".
>
>In other words, you don't know, can't answer, have no cites, and want me
>to do the research to prove it?

Nope.  Try again.

-- 
John

"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -Mark Twain
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." -Alexander Pope
"Being ignorant is not so much a shame, 
as being unwilling to learn." -Benjamin Franklin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jml6569799oeteektm3cf38a6muv22hubq@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com> <1fj3565k3evc6jje3ij8shhfkftbgp6et6@4ax.com> <nj3456praioq3mlij37c4bcst6i8n0d6i3@4ax.com> <2q4456h5erv7jfegqt0154vtb0uqblfh7g@4ax.com> <daf4565na6ianj22krurgusdul3vq881s9@4ax.com> <rnu55651esmbuk9a51ebgu51vl043dn6fl@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:49:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <jml6569799oeteektm3cf38a6muv22hubq@4ax.com>
References: <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com> <1fj3565k3evc6jje3ij8shhfkftbgp6et6@4ax.com> <nj3456praioq3mlij37c4bcst6i8n0d6i3@4ax.com> <2q4456h5erv7jfegqt0154vtb0uqblfh7g@4ax.com> <daf4565na6ianj22krurgusdul3vq881s9@4ax.com> <rnu55651esmbuk9a51ebgu51vl043dn6fl@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:49:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Z69Ylg5oWFjLftPdMfPgDA";
 logging-data="4236"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/F+IDhjWaanwccUwSri+bw"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/T58OftDq54QOMRyiRUMSUR5shQ=