🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #190

Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

#190
From: Char Jackson
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:09
38 lines
3156 bytes
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:48:20 -0700, John Navas
<spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:25:07 -0500, in
><m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com>, Char Jackson
><none@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:40:21 GMT, sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>jcdill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>There was cell service AND WiFi internet signal at Black Rock City in 
>>>>2009.  
>>>
>>>They've had Internet for at least 6 years, but the cell service is a new 
>>>thing.  Does this mean that some enterprising cell company brings in portable 
>>>cell sites?  Otherwise I couldn't think of how else they'd do it.  It's way 
>>>too far to get a signal in and out of Gerlach or Empire I'd think.
>>
>>I still haven't figured out why you have such an objection to cell
>>towers. To me, they aren't nearly as objectionable as the golden
>>arches of McDonald's, for example.
>
>We prohibit those (the big ones) too.
>
>>In fact, I'd take a standard tower
>>with panel antennas over a fake tree any day. Did you have a bad
>>experience with a cell tower at some point?
>
>All the time -- butt ugly.

If you and David dislike the occasional cell tower, standard telephone
poles must really drive you nuts. Not only are there a lot more of
them, (where utilities aren't buried, of course), but they aren't up
as high as cell towers and they're all connected by unsightly wires.
Seems like you'd complain about those long before focusing on cell
towers.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <vom6569fqsq01tb7a9sjjtmgr6g4m9k2bo@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com> <i2uc5i$t96$3@news.eternal-september.org> <i2ut4q$a1k$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2vgs5$q4u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com> <akl65697de38rbseg71jitd09sutr4fm8v@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Char Jackson <none@none.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Message-ID: <vom6569fqsq01tb7a9sjjtmgr6g4m9k2bo@4ax.com>
References: <v4u15659qncovipl40hutg4iieihmuubtk@4ax.com> <Xns9DC429072B37noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <um2356pu3t5t2rm51s39c9o1duntrtalb6@4ax.com> <Xns9DC4CAB54717Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <rg5456d7isqsi0dooijrvdajtnv718lldi@4ax.com> <i2uc5i$t96$3@news.eternal-september.org> <i2ut4q$a1k$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i2vgs5$q4u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <m6k656tbrl8avlttv0tsp63tn897e61cf0@4ax.com> <akl65697de38rbseg71jitd09sutr4fm8v@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 39
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:09:17 -0500