Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #213Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
From: John Navas
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:09
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:09
28 lines
3071 bytes
3071 bytes
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:48:06 -0700, in <higgy-B6175C.00480529072010@news.announcetech.com>, John Higdon <higgy@kome.com> wrote: >In article <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org>, > sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com (David Kaye) wrote: > >> Yeah, I know that it's nice to have good cell coverage, but the antennas are >> unsightly. Especially in a city such as SF where people are proud of the >> architecture and the views, hanging antennas on the sides of buildings makes >> them really really ugly. > >Wires for the trolley buses are probably the most ugly fixture of a big >city that one can see, IMHO. I'll bet no one said a word when that >system went up all over town. And thats not to mention the interference >to radio and television reception they create. > >Quite honestly, I would think good phone service would trump crappy bus >service (and don't get started with me about that: I use the Muni all >the time.) Wish I could use my cell phone in the city! Switch carriers. My T-Mobile phone works everywhere I've tried it. -- John "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups." [Wethern๏ฟฝs Law of Suspended Judgement]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7r2356pujpdj1vuaqckgjursrc8qs7psdl@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.71.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <higgy-B6175C.00480529072010@news.announcetech.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: f9250,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gid5695fe328a,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.71.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.cingular,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:09:09 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <7r2356pujpdj1vuaqckgjursrc8qs7psdl@4ax.com> References: <3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <higgy-B6175C.00480529072010@news.announcetech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0N80NzQa/8+7JzQ8kHrVvQ"; logging-data="27420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18H1QyFelGk9nfm667h7/fa" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Cancel-Lock: sha1:3M2jqAl1Z+4fG425VIs6QvWWIHo=