Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco

Article View: alt.cellular.attws

Article #214

Back to alt.cellular.attws Previous Next

#214

From: John Navas
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:10

32 lines
3118 bytes

On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:41:02 -0700, in
<4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, SMS
<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

>David Kaye wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I know that it's nice to have good cell coverage, but the antennas are 
>> unsightly.  Especially in a city such as SF where people are proud of the 
>> architecture and the views, hanging antennas on the sides of buildings makes 
>> them really really ugly.
>
>I was at a meeting where T-Mobile was given approval for a rooftop 
>antenna with the only caveat being that they had to shield the equipment 
>(not the tower) from view from the nearby neighborhood. They refused.
>
>The early carriers (who eventually morphed into Verizon and AT&T) have 
>the advantage of having been able to install lots of towers before 
>neighborhoods realized what was happening, in addition to the advantage 
>of being on 800 MHz not 1900 MHz.

There is no such advantage, as the citations I've posted make clear.

>[SNIP pro-Verizon nonsense]

-- 
John

"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -Mark Twain
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." -Alexander Pope
"Being ignorant is not so much a shame, 
as being unwilling to learn." -Benjamin Franklin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.68.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

References:

<3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 110038,f35d7f214e6ebb35
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 104fd2,5dc541db3c8c4527
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,e5f42faf3ca79ee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gide43d82042,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.68.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,alt.internet.wireless,ba.internet
Subject: Re: NEWS: Up to 2 years for even small panel cell antennas to be approved in San Francisco
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:10:45 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <3t2356h5420lsqfvhe1h5cp12nnqt9vk59@4ax.com>
References: <3pol161pki2f0ffvt633dt1kgoev7bioss@4ax.com> <3uol16l2chdrcbl07a853mq1s8j88tqeav@4ax.com> <hnd346hrhipdljp6mgqcc6s2ii21mpk742@4ax.com> <cj99469087mt6pgfm2nic3hlk32q7v0ogl@4ax.com> <mhtp46910o69euklvbmhn4ugurpu0edsk0@4ax.com> <enhr4650gjv4lg4nk4jopk4b17jh4htu0c@4ax.com> <0cdv46dcsjfutuli24iagp60u1sjrva53g@4ax.com> <osk0561hjli19tfrgtu12b80anh8i5dj4r@4ax.com> <i2r9q0$el1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <4c5176da$0$22167$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:10:36 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0N80NzQa/8+7JzQ8kHrVvQ";
 logging-data="27420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/t/yFnWrF0ktbMD1oQMjeG"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7b6e8QtkUWm5upkCSqzQ+V6WKwU=

Reply to Parent Message