Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #265Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: JC Dill
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:32
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:32
24 lines
2298 bytes
2298 bytes
nospam wrote: > In article <a99646p2u3qfbi9jgtq45qk65a4ucnihpl@4ax.com>, Jeff > Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: > >>>> as i recall, the fcc limited output power to 0.6w on a handheld, 1.2w >>>> on a bagphone and 3w on a car phone. >> I don't recall any 1.2w limit on bag phones. > > i do, but i can't find a link about it and don't have time to dig. > >> The typical Motorola >> AMPS bag phone was exactly the same radio as the Motorola mobile >> phone. I had both and they were both 3 watts. > > i had a bag phone too and i'm positive it was 1.2w, but it's in storage > (not sure why because it's worthless) and i have no way to test it. That may be true for your phone but I know *my* bag phone was 3 watts, and that most bag phones of the era were 3 watts. Here's a whole website devoted to these phones: http://www.motorola3watts.com/ jc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<i209uk$ddg$1@speranza.aioe.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <a99646p2u3qfbi9jgtq45qk65a4ucnihpl@4ax.com> <180720101921500295%nospam@nospam.invalid>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:32:05 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 24 Message-ID: <i209uk$ddg$1@speranza.aioe.org> References: <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <a99646p2u3qfbi9jgtq45qk65a4ucnihpl@4ax.com> <180720101921500295%nospam@nospam.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: hwLIugIteoP5xTthS/9KVg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)