Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #266Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: nospam
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:54
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:54
10 lines
2176 bytes
2176 bytes
In article <i209uk$ddg$1@speranza.aioe.org>, JC Dill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > That may be true for your phone but I know *my* bag phone was 3 watts, > and that most bag phones of the era were 3 watts. Here's a whole > website devoted to these phones: as i said, i don't know how they got around the 1.2 watt limit, but obviously they did. my guess is they managed to get it classified as a car phone, which had a 3 watt limit.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<180720102154259626%nospam@nospam.invalid>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <a99646p2u3qfbi9jgtq45qk65a4ucnihpl@4ax.com> <180720101921500295%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i209uk$ddg$1@speranza.aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:54:25 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: <180720102154259626%nospam@nospam.invalid> References: <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> <a99646p2u3qfbi9jgtq45qk65a4ucnihpl@4ax.com> <180720101921500295%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i209uk$ddg$1@speranza.aioe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA"; logging-data="5076"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193LGDyzkqGsh7YsbUmHFsS" User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fXfsd4VSOExL+P7SeVf4Kj9aX+Y=