Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #325Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: nospam
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:38
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:38
16 lines
2393 bytes
2393 bytes
In article <i1u8e5$7h1$2@speranza.aioe.org>, JC Dill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > > nope. bag phones were limited to 1.2 watts and handhelds to 0.6 watts. > > only carphones could do 3 watts. > > Wrong. I had a 3 watt bag phone circa 1994 (I still have it, stashed in > a box in storage). then it doubled as a car phone. a bag phone was supposed to be 1.2 watts maximum. > For a brief time you could even get 5 watt phones. make and model? i have never heard of any analog cellphone that was more than 3 watts.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<180720100338100493%nospam@nospam.invalid>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <yx5%n.36029$YX3.29859@newsfe18.iad> <4c3cf409$0$22110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <h7jq369avp6khdjbc8uivaioh8miie84tn@4ax.com> <4c3dab03$0$22127$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <cmrr3650cdqpfkimtqgb45nj36vgsp3o8i@4ax.com> <siegman-5AA573.13052714072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu> <rnss361grsdicbd06rbajlgniho8d4877o@4ax.com> <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8e5$7h1$2@speranza.aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:38:10 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <180720100338100493%nospam@nospam.invalid> References: <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <yx5%n.36029$YX3.29859@newsfe18.iad> <4c3cf409$0$22110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <h7jq369avp6khdjbc8uivaioh8miie84tn@4ax.com> <4c3dab03$0$22127$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <cmrr3650cdqpfkimtqgb45nj36vgsp3o8i@4ax.com> <siegman-5AA573.13052714072010@sciid-srv02.med.tufts.edu> <rnss361grsdicbd06rbajlgniho8d4877o@4ax.com> <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8e5$7h1$2@speranza.aioe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA"; logging-data="17253"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KzsBi4l77vLyU7yFq8f3y" User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6VV4iU8fnZ4Kr5PgAYnRlBuIH34=