Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #326Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: nospam
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:39
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:39
20 lines
2191 bytes
2191 bytes
In article <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org>, JC Dill <jcdill.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > > yep, i have one somewhere. i can't believe people carried those things. > > I didn't "carry" mine - it lived on the center of the seat of my truck. i remember seeing people carrying them. > > as i recall, the fcc limited output power to 0.6w on a handheld, 1.2w > > on a bagphone and 3w on a car phone. > > You recall wrong. Circa 1992-1994 you could buy a 3 watt bag phone. as i said in the other post, it had to have been more than just a bag phone. > I'm told that circa 1990 you could buy a 5 watt bag phone. specific model?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<180720100339265088%nospam@nospam.invalid>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:39:26 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <180720100339265088%nospam@nospam.invalid> References: <Xns9DB610031F9CCnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1m8iq$q7u$1@news.eternal-september.org> <2gd246h1dm904pbp9mm4a6hse2hk6hqfmp@4ax.com> <Xns9DB8EB62D8FF7noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <180720100001450673%nospam@nospam.invalid> <dbw0o.19896$lS1.7928@newsfe12.iad> <180720100149520637%nospam@nospam.invalid> <i1u8ij$7h1$3@speranza.aioe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sdwj3r/sAkX/JwCAxkeUMA"; logging-data="17253"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QmTw67yUzsRXx6Dy819ak" User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.3 (Carbon/OS X) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uA2k3NSQsbLNkNDhyMttq7gIUng=