Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #497Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: SMS
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:33
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:33
33 lines
3020 bytes
3020 bytes
On 13/07/10 6:21 AM, Carl wrote: > David Kaye wrote: >> Larry<noone@home.com> wrote: >> >>> I was kidding to make a point about iPhone 4 and duct tape, which is >>> hilarious. >> >> I was not kidding to make a point that some of the best investments >> are the non-sexy companies that have sure and steady product lines. >> 3M is one of the best. Apple...well, let's see how they do now that >> CR is not recommending the iPhone. >> >> > Believe me, the teenagers and the "must have an iPhone" trendies are not the > ones who also read. It will effect them not. But that's the problem. The carriers and smart phone manufacturers are trying to move beyond the teenage and fanatic market, and beyond the market of businesses supplying their employees with smart phones. The recent AT&T changes in pricing were partly to try to encourage more frugal users (that actually look at the recurring costs not just the handset cost) to buy smart phones. By the same token, since the iPhone4 antenna issue can be resolved with a case, and since few people would not use a case on an iPhone, it's probably less of an issue than the media is making it out to be. The media likes to pick on Apple because of Apple's attitude. The bigger issue is that with the iPhone only on AT&T, Apple loses access to hundreds of millions of potential customers that won't or can't use AT&T. The wild success of the Android is not due just to the platform's capabilities (both in hardware and software) it's because, in the words of Mrs. Collins, "You get what you get or you get nothing."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4c3c875d$0$22095$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <Xns9DB3A891ABBF2noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1fvfq$icr$1@news.eternal-september.org> <Xns9DB3E10886594noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1h2jm$smt$2@news.eternal-september.org> <4c3c68a2$0$22511$607ed4bc@cv.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:33:54 -0700 From: SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <Xns9DB3A891ABBF2noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1fvfq$icr$1@news.eternal-september.org> <Xns9DB3E10886594noonehomecom@74.209.131.13> <i1h2jm$smt$2@news.eternal-september.org> <4c3c68a2$0$22511$607ed4bc@cv.net> In-Reply-To: <4c3c68a2$0$22511$607ed4bc@cv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 33 Message-ID: <4c3c875d$0$22095$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> Organization: Sonic.Net NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jul 2010 15:33:49 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: cbaa159e.news.sonic.net X-Trace: DXC=?[35JSReW3JTA:A;8DQ5^Km4K\QM1CV^@1OYf0H`?;XADJA^I<17G:M@C@@_`9Z^QHdHA9L>89S]K X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net