Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #498Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: John Slade
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:41
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:41
87 lines
4889 bytes
4889 bytes
On 7/12/2010 2:44 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article<qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad>, John Slade
> <hhitman86@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>>> Yea it's clear from Youtube videos and tests like the one
>>>> from CR that the iPhone 4 has a hardware problem when it comes
>>>> to the antenna.
>>>
>>> touch any phone's antenna, watch what happens.
>>
>> The iPhone 4's antenna is put in a bad place. Right where
>> someone would hold it. That's poor design and apparently Apple
>> has job openings for antenna engineers now. I wonder if they
>> fired the guy who decided to put the antenna there.
>
> the job openings were there since last january and likely have
> absolutely nothing to do with the iphone.
>
> other phones have antennas in bad places too, like this one:
> <http://i48.tinypic.com/x0xsi9.jpg>
>
>>>> Apple is flat out lying when they say it's only
>>>> a software issue.
>>>
>>> when did you examine the software?
>>>
>>> oh right, you didn't.
>>
>> Apple claimed that there was no hardware issue with the
>> iPhone's antenna.
>
> apple said the iphone 4 has the best reception of any phone, something
> that anandtech confirmed.
I don't know if this is true or not but it doesn't
have that great reception if the person holds it without duct
tape, a case or some other device.
> apple also said there are problems with the
> firmware and they're working on fixing it.
Apple claimed it was a problem with the software that gave
incorrect readings on the signal strength meter. They put out a
patch and claimed that was the real problem behind the problem.
However many people have implemented the patch and still have
the problem. There are videos on the Internet confirming this.
The antenna is in a bad place, plain and simple.
>
> however, everyone is suddenly an rf engineer and thinks they have all
> the answers, even when apple themselves haven't completely figured it
> out.
There is nothing to figure out. The antenna is in a bad
place. It's around the edge right where people hold it. This
allows me to figure out a couple of things. Apple rushed the
iPhone 4 to market without proper testing. They rushed it to
market to keep up with companies who are putting out phones that
are more advanced than the iPhone. Apple didn't want to fall
behind.
>
> in short, there are a lot of variables that can affect reception,
> antenna placement being just one.
Exactly, Apple put it in the wrong place.
>
>> Consumer Reports and others have shown there
>> is a hardware issue. The funny thing was Apple's first response
>> to the problem that consisted of "You're not holding it right!"
>
> apple is not handling this particularly well. they should have said 'we
> are working on it and will have more info to follow.'
I agree. Apple tries to keep the image that their products
are better by design. This was actually true years ago. I
remember an Apple user who was clueless who told me that Apple
computers are "engineered" when computers from other companies
are not. These other computers are just slapped together from
OEM parts. Apple's own marketing strategy is what leads people
to believe this silly notion and Apple doesn't want to part from
that. Apple's quality has gone way down in the last ten years
but they remain successful by keeping up the illusion that their
products are unique and better.
John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe14.iad.POSTED!839ee1e6!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe14.iad.POSTED!839ee1e6!not-for-mail From: John Slade <hhitman86@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> In-Reply-To: <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100713-0, 07/13/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 87 Message-ID: <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad> X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:41:12 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:41:11 -0700