🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #503

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#503
From: Peter Lawrence
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:03
16 lines
2321 bytes
On 7/13/10 8:41 AM, John Slade wrote:
>
> There is nothing to figure out. The antenna is in a bad place. It's around
> the edge right where people hold it. This allows me to figure out a couple
> of things. Apple rushed the iPhone 4 to market without proper testing. They
> rushed it to market to keep up with companies who are putting out phones
> that are more advanced than the iPhone.

Actually, I think a good part of the problem is that Apple tested the new 
iPhone in the "real world" using a case that disguised it as an older iPhone 
3GS, hence, during the "real world" testing, the new iPhone 4 didn't exhibit 
the antenna problem because the testers (like the engineer who left his 
prototype iPhone in a Redwood City bar) never used the new iPhone without a 
case attached to it.

- Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID: <i1i9p1$us4$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Lawrence <hummbaby@aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:03:10 -0700
Organization: America Online
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <i1i9p1$us4$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <120720101354048311%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qEL_n.10358$wm1.6901@newsfe01.iad> <120720101444581497%nospam@nospam.invalid> <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:03:13 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0qFhcNK6PCWhTrA0eqUYLg";
 logging-data="31620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19M1qTI0rKd8eNrDF0MfS+YM7AdcvE25TU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
In-Reply-To: <sO%_n.24533$Zi.23243@newsfe14.iad>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:d8EtoG+ZMkSGNMBcSHBCvTDtRMI=