Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #504Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
From: Peter Lawrence
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11
36 lines
3166 bytes
3166 bytes
On 7/13/10 9:03 AM, John Navas wrote: > > While there are some hardware problems that can be worked-around or at > least alleviated in software, there are also some that cannot, and this > looks to me to be more likely in the latter category, with only fig leaf > fixes (e.g., no signal strength meter) possible. > > I think the interesting question is whether or not Apple will try to > slipstream a change to the iPhone 4 hardware, or tough out this design > for a year until iPhone 5. > > The problem of toughing it out is that the problem will continue to grow > should it ultimately lose in court or in the court of public opinion. > > The problem with a slipstream change is that it would throw fuel on the > fire of the criticism and lawsuits unless Apple is prepared to offer > free hardware swaps, which would be a huge hit to the bottom line. > > I personally think Apple will probably continue to stonewall and push > fig leaf "solutions", risking its brand, because that's the Steve Jobs > Way. How successful that will be only time will tell. Probably the least costly solution for Apple would be to repackage the iPhone 4 with those new "bumpers" that Apple is trying to sell for an additional $29. Those silicon bumpers probably doesn't cost more than 10 cents to manufacture and they solve the iPhone 4 antenna problem. They could offer this bumper (in basic black) for free to anyone who already had bought an iPhone 4. http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC597ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA0NA&mco=MTM3NTI0ODg They could still try to sell the bumpers that come in other colors for those who are into customizing the look of their iPhones. - Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<i1ia7r$1hs$1@news.eternal-september.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Lawrence <hummbaby@aol.com> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:11:05 -0700 Organization: America Online Lines: 37 Message-ID: <i1ia7r$1hs$1@news.eternal-september.org> References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0qFhcNK6PCWhTrA0eqUYLg"; logging-data="1596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rQEfeWarWfB929EjU3t/ZjDbSKm0RQ6E=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 In-Reply-To: <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:p75mhb107FyrYKTBM+bI7vqLB9Y=