🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.cellular.attws
Article #504

Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended

#504
From: Peter Lawrence
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11
36 lines
3166 bytes
On 7/13/10 9:03 AM, John Navas wrote:
>
> While there are some hardware problems that can be worked-around or at
> least alleviated in software, there are also some that cannot, and this
> looks to me to be more likely in the latter category, with only fig leaf
> fixes (e.g., no signal strength meter) possible.
>
> I think the interesting question is whether or not Apple will try to
> slipstream a change to the iPhone 4 hardware, or tough out this design
> for a year until iPhone 5.
>
> The problem of toughing it out is that the problem will continue to grow
> should it ultimately lose in court or in the court of public opinion.
>
> The problem with a slipstream change is that it would throw fuel on the
> fire of the criticism and lawsuits unless Apple is prepared to offer
> free hardware swaps, which would be a huge hit to the bottom line.
>
> I personally think Apple will probably continue to stonewall and push
> fig leaf "solutions", risking its brand, because that's the Steve Jobs
> Way.  How successful that will be only time will tell.

Probably the least costly solution for Apple would be to repackage the 
iPhone 4 with those new "bumpers" that Apple is trying to sell for an 
additional $29.  Those silicon bumpers probably doesn't cost more than 10 
cents to manufacture and they solve the iPhone 4 antenna problem.  They 
could offer this bumper (in basic black) for free to anyone who already had 
bought an iPhone 4.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC597ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA0NA&mco=MTM3NTI0ODg

They could still try to sell the bumpers that come in other colors for those 
who are into customizing the look of their iPhones.


- Peter
Technical Details
Message-ID: <i1ia7r$1hs$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 110038,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa874,d8a6e883f28322e7
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gidd668eef4dc,gidaa617e85ca,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Lawrence <hummbaby@aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.attws,ba.internet
Subject: Re: Consumer Reports: iPhone 4 - Not recommended
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:11:05 -0700
Organization: America Online
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <i1ia7r$1hs$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <i1frtr$q3$1@news.eternal-september.org> <98L_n.737$o27.20@newsfe08.iad> <4c3b8bed$0$1323$815e3792@news.qwest.net> <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:11:08 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0qFhcNK6PCWhTrA0eqUYLg";
 logging-data="1596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rQEfeWarWfB929EjU3t/ZjDbSKm0RQ6E="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
In-Reply-To: <c13p36lma7ih200moc4u88kviu36djnnt6@4ax.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p75mhb107FyrYKTBM+bI7vqLB9Y=