🚀 go-pugleaf

StreeTwisE <Reply Group Only@> wrote in message
news:4053f598$0$27643$61ce578d@news.syd.swiftdsl.com.au...

> Changed ya nick have ya Rod?

Even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out
why that was done with that particular post, if someone was
stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.


> "wlloo" <wloo@NOSPAM.zap.com> wrote in message
> news:4053dae9$0$22525$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
> |
> | chris <see@reply.to.field> wrote in message
> | news:MPG.1abde464feda9508989cfc@news.claranews.com...
> | > Rod Speed wrote
> | >> chris <see@reply.to.field> wrote
> | >>> 1013 wrote
> |
> | >>>> Ever heard of democracy?
> |
> | >>> Go on then, define 'democracy'?
> |
> | >> You first.
> |
> | > Basically, there is no true democracy.
> |
> | Mindlessly silly. There are various types of democracy
> | and only a fool would be stupid enough to claim that
> | there is only one 'true' democracy.
> |
> | You clearly are one of those fools.
> |
> | > Switzerland is the closest example of a
> | > Country that engages in true 'democracy'.
> |
> | Only if you are stupid enough to claim that a direct
> | vote on particular issues is the only 'true' democracy.
> |
> | And even with the approach the swiss take, thats much more
> | complicated than it looks because no one, including the swiss,
> | actually get a direct vote on every bit of legislation and it only
> | gets enacted when it ends up with a majority voting for it.
> |
> | AND even if that approach was taken, they certainly dont get
> | a direct vote line by line on the bits of every bit of legislation.
> |
> | Even someone as stupid as you should
> | have noticed that that just aint feasible.
> |
> | AND one of the VERY fundamental basis of any real democracy
> | is that some issues arent ever put to the vote, like say if morons
> | should be killed when identified, or whether its ever put to the
> | vote that just one religion is the only acceptible religion, etc etc etc.
> |
> | > For a definition of 'democracy' might I suggest you read
> | > the numerous academic txt books available on the subject?
> |
> | Read them thanks, likely before you were even born.
> |
> | So you can take your suggestion and shove it up your arse.
> |
> | And thats not a suggestion, thats an order.
> |
> | > It's something I covered in year 3, but unfortunately
> | > the topic hasn't come up in my MA programme
> | > :(
> |
> | Just another silly little know it all posturing child which
> | in fact knows sweet fuck all about anything at all.
> |
> | In spades with the real world.
> |
> | >>> Quick question for you: which Country is more
> | >>> Democratic - America, France or Britain?
> |
> | >> Mindlessly silly question.
> |
> | > The answer is America and France first.
> |
> | There is no 'answer' you stupid pig ignorant child.
> |
> | In some respects SOME of the american system is
> | much more democratic than anything the frogs have,
> | particularly with the referendums that some states have.
> |
> | In other respects america is much worse,
> | particularly the quite undemocratic approach they
> | have with  presidential candidates for example.
> |
> | > Then Britain.  Britain is seen by many social scientists
> | > as less democratic than either America or France
> | > because we have an unelected Royal Family.
> |
> | More mindlessly silly stuff. Its got fuck all to
> | do with whether some grossly inbred royals are
> | elected or not when they have no power at all.
> |
> | You can however make a case that the pom
> | House of Lords is by far the least democratic
> | institution amoungst just those 3 countrys.
> |
> | Tho the frog system has its own
> | terminal stupidtys in those areas.
> |
> | > America and France, otoh, do not.
> |
> | Pity thats got sweet fuck all to do with what is a 'true' democracy.
> |
> | >> And on posting styles, its actually
> | >> freedom of choice that matters.
> |
> | > Rubbish.
> |
> | Yep, you'd know all about that.
> |
> | > It's about conforming to etiquette.
> |
> | Pigs arse it is. There is no such animal as 'etiquette'
> | with usenet which happens to be as close to pure
> | anarchy as you are ever likely to personally experience.
> |
> | >> It doesnt happen to be something you and your ilk get any say
> | >> what so ever on, except in the sense of how you post yourself.
> |
> | > But someone has already had a say on it!
> |
> | Crap.
> |
> | > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
> |
> | Just the mindless spew from some terminal fuckwit that gets
> | no say what so ever on anything at all posting style wise.
> |
> | >> You get to like that or lump it.
> |
> | > *sigh*
> |
> | Heavy breathing aint gunna save your bacon, child.
> |
> | > *PLONK*
> |
> | Typical childish stunt. Spew your puerile shit and then
> | put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and try
> | the usual thing 3 year olds try, 'nyah nyah, cant hear ya'
> |
> | Fat lot of good that will do you anyway, child.
> |
> |
>