🚀 go-pugleaf

What about the biscuit?



"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c30tgv$200mqh$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de...
|
| StreeTwisE <Reply Group Only@> wrote in message
| news:4053f598$0$27643$61ce578d@news.syd.swiftdsl.com.au...
|
| > Changed ya nick have ya Rod?
|
| Even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out
| why that was done with that particular post, if someone was
| stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
|
|
| > "wlloo" <wloo@NOSPAM.zap.com> wrote in message
| > news:4053dae9$0$22525$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au...
| > |
| > | chris <see@reply.to.field> wrote in message
| > | news:MPG.1abde464feda9508989cfc@news.claranews.com...
| > | > Rod Speed wrote
| > | >> chris <see@reply.to.field> wrote
| > | >>> 1013 wrote
| > |
| > | >>>> Ever heard of democracy?
| > |
| > | >>> Go on then, define 'democracy'?
| > |
| > | >> You first.
| > |
| > | > Basically, there is no true democracy.
| > |
| > | Mindlessly silly. There are various types of democracy
| > | and only a fool would be stupid enough to claim that
| > | there is only one 'true' democracy.
| > |
| > | You clearly are one of those fools.
| > |
| > | > Switzerland is the closest example of a
| > | > Country that engages in true 'democracy'.
| > |
| > | Only if you are stupid enough to claim that a direct
| > | vote on particular issues is the only 'true' democracy.
| > |
| > | And even with the approach the swiss take, thats much more
| > | complicated than it looks because no one, including the swiss,
| > | actually get a direct vote on every bit of legislation and it only
| > | gets enacted when it ends up with a majority voting for it.
| > |
| > | AND even if that approach was taken, they certainly dont get
| > | a direct vote line by line on the bits of every bit of legislation.
| > |
| > | Even someone as stupid as you should
| > | have noticed that that just aint feasible.
| > |
| > | AND one of the VERY fundamental basis of any real democracy
| > | is that some issues arent ever put to the vote, like say if morons
| > | should be killed when identified, or whether its ever put to the
| > | vote that just one religion is the only acceptible religion, etc etc
etc.
| > |
| > | > For a definition of 'democracy' might I suggest you read
| > | > the numerous academic txt books available on the subject?
| > |
| > | Read them thanks, likely before you were even born.
| > |
| > | So you can take your suggestion and shove it up your arse.
| > |
| > | And thats not a suggestion, thats an order.
| > |
| > | > It's something I covered in year 3, but unfortunately
| > | > the topic hasn't come up in my MA programme
| > | > :(
| > |
| > | Just another silly little know it all posturing child which
| > | in fact knows sweet fuck all about anything at all.
| > |
| > | In spades with the real world.
| > |
| > | >>> Quick question for you: which Country is more
| > | >>> Democratic - America, France or Britain?
| > |
| > | >> Mindlessly silly question.
| > |
| > | > The answer is America and France first.
| > |
| > | There is no 'answer' you stupid pig ignorant child.
| > |
| > | In some respects SOME of the american system is
| > | much more democratic than anything the frogs have,
| > | particularly with the referendums that some states have.
| > |
| > | In other respects america is much worse,
| > | particularly the quite undemocratic approach they
| > | have with  presidential candidates for example.
| > |
| > | > Then Britain.  Britain is seen by many social scientists
| > | > as less democratic than either America or France
| > | > because we have an unelected Royal Family.
| > |
| > | More mindlessly silly stuff. Its got fuck all to
| > | do with whether some grossly inbred royals are
| > | elected or not when they have no power at all.
| > |
| > | You can however make a case that the pom
| > | House of Lords is by far the least democratic
| > | institution amoungst just those 3 countrys.
| > |
| > | Tho the frog system has its own
| > | terminal stupidtys in those areas.
| > |
| > | > America and France, otoh, do not.
| > |
| > | Pity thats got sweet fuck all to do with what is a 'true' democracy.
| > |
| > | >> And on posting styles, its actually
| > | >> freedom of choice that matters.
| > |
| > | > Rubbish.
| > |
| > | Yep, you'd know all about that.
| > |
| > | > It's about conforming to etiquette.
| > |
| > | Pigs arse it is. There is no such animal as 'etiquette'
| > | with usenet which happens to be as close to pure
| > | anarchy as you are ever likely to personally experience.
| > |
| > | >> It doesnt happen to be something you and your ilk get any say
| > | >> what so ever on, except in the sense of how you post yourself.
| > |
| > | > But someone has already had a say on it!
| > |
| > | Crap.
| > |
| > | > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html
| > |
| > | Just the mindless spew from some terminal fuckwit that gets
| > | no say what so ever on anything at all posting style wise.
| > |
| > | >> You get to like that or lump it.
| > |
| > | > *sigh*
| > |
| > | Heavy breathing aint gunna save your bacon, child.
| > |
| > | > *PLONK*
| > |
| > | Typical childish stunt. Spew your puerile shit and then
| > | put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and try
| > | the usual thing 3 year olds try, 'nyah nyah, cant hear ya'
| > |
| > | Fat lot of good that will do you anyway, child.
| > |
| > |
| >
|
|