🚀 go-pugleaf

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> said

> 
> Kwyjibo <KwyjiboYourPanties@ozdebate.com> wrote
> in message news:Xns94B21AC91CF34ssss@130.133.1.4...
>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> said
>>> Kwyjibo <KwyjiboYourPanties@ozdebate.com> wrote
>>>> a_dud <blax@blox.com> said
> 
>>>>> hey stupid....
> 
>>>> Waddya want, fucktard?  (this ought to be good....)
> 
>>> Wanna bet ?
> 
>>>>> Our Senate is elected by us....
> 
>>>> No shit Einstein. Care to point out where I said it's not?
> 
>>>>> we go and vote for it on a piece of paper every 3 years...
> 
>>>> You only vote for half of it every three years.
> 
>>> And not necessarily every 3 years either.
> 
>>>> They serve 6 year terms, fuckwit.
> 
>>> When there isnt a double dissolution, anyway.
> 
>>>>> actually theres 2 pieces of paper....one for the
>>>>> Lower House and one for the Upper House....
> 
>>>>> we learnt from the Westminister System and the
>>>>> American System and we got the best of both worlds...
> 
>>>> Crap. We've got absolutely nothing from the American system.
> 
>>> Thats just plain wrong. The poms dont have a written constitution,
> 
>> Yes they do. It's just not written down anywhere.
> 
> Thats what a written constitution means, fuckwit.
> 

Nice bit of altering posts there Rod. Pity you're fooling no-one.
Here's your claim as it was originally posted:

"The poms dont have a constitution"
No mention of 'written' in there.

Keep backpedaling, stupid.

>>> we do. And some parts of ours have been copied
>>> almost word for word from the yankee one,
>>> particularly the bit about freedom of religion.
> 
>> And WTF has that got to do with our political system
>> and how useless politicians are voted into power.
> 
> Everything to do with blowing a fucking great
> hole in your stupid pig ignorant claim that "We've
> got absolutely nothing from the American system"
>

When we were talking about the system of voting in governments, that's 
correct.
Learn the meaning of the word 'context', fuckwit.
 
> Wrong. As always.
> 
>>> The poms dont even have a written constitution at all.
> 
>> Correct.
> 
>>> We have a federal system thats a lot closer
>>> to the yank system than to the pom system.
> 
>> Bullshit.
> 
> Fraid not.
> 
>> The biggest difference is that we have a Monarch
>> as head of state who holds  no real power.
> 
> Thats much less important than the federal system.
> 
>> We have a Prime Minister as head of
>> government who actually runs the place.
> 
> He runs fuck all, and isnt even mentioned in the constitution anyway.
>

What's that got to do with who holds power and how they are elected (which 
is what the conversation was about, fuckwit)
 
>> The US has a President who is head of state as
>> well as head of government and has real power.
> 
> Not much that doesnt have to have the Congress endorse it.
> 

Wrong again, as always. Ever heard of an executive order?
About the only thing he can't do is pass new laws or declare an official 
war (notice the word 'official' in there) Within the current laws he is 
free to do as he pleases.

>> The only thing we have in common with the
>> US is that we get to vote on our senators.
> 
> More pig ignorant bullshit. We have the federal system in common too.
> 
> And the terminal stupidity where each state gets the same
> number of senators, regardless of the population of the state.
> 
> And some of the other constitutional detail too like freedom of religion.
>

Which has sweet fuck all to do with voting in government.
(context, Roddles, context.....)
 
> The stupid poms dont even have an elected upper house.
>

Which is what I said in the first place. (read the very next line....)
 
>>>> We got the British system with the bonus(???) of being
>>>> able to vote on our upper house representatives.
> 
>>>>> ours is as close to true representation as u can get...
>>>>> although others will argue about the State/Senate issue...
> 
>>>>> oh and the Governor-General, the Queens Representative
>>>>> only signs off laws to make them legal.
> 
>>>> Which gives him veto powers over any law introduced by
>>>> an elected government. Not very democratic, is it, stupid.
> 
>>>>> He has the power to disband the Government
> 
>>>> Which has happened before. An unelected official representing
>>>> a monarch overseas having the power to sack a democratically
>>>> elected government? Doesn't sound very representative to me.
> 
>>> Death squad for you then.
> 
>> It's Australia, not Chile, fuckwit.
> 
> Wrong. As always. Cretin.
> 
>>>>> only when a serious issue arrises and both houses
>>>>> don't agree...aka Supply of Money....etc...after that
>>>>> by law an election MUST be held within a short time....
> 
>>>>> just to clear up a few facts about u uneducated
>>>>> lot on the other side of the world who dont much
>>>>> read up on other countries and their systems....
> 
>>>> Unlike you, you illiterate fuckwit, who cant
>>>> even follow a thread and make any sense of it.
> 
>>> Does that make it threadbare ?
> 
>> Brain-bare more like.
> 
> No such animal, cretin.
> 
>>> Threadbear would be much better.
> 
>> Or Deadbear?
> 
> Down, child.
> 
>>>>> with the Internet around these days and search
>>>>> functions...it does make you stupid in one way.
> 
>>>> So does not being able to read a usenet header
>>>> and know that I am in Australia, you fuckwit.
> 
>>> Bit hard to do that with your head up a threadbear's arse.
> 
>> Yep. It's an idiot.
> 
> 
> 



-- 

Kwyj.

"War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce 

(Remove your panties to reply by email)