🚀 go-pugleaf

Rod Speed wrote in message ...
>
>Hyper <jimb@snip.net> wrote in message
>news:37C5FEEF.1D3AD23A@snip.net...
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Hyper <jimb@snip.net> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Aaron <chaaron@lave.net> wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote in message ...
>
>>>>>>> And any decent defragger that doesnt mindless move around
>>>>>>> static files, will do just as well with a single partition too. The
static
>>>>>>> files just stay at the front of the drive and the stuff that changes
>>>>>>> ends up at the boundary between the used and free space.
>
>>>>>> Rod, you have mentioned this "decent defragger" before,
>
>>>>> I didnt mention any specific decent defragger,
>>>>> I clearly said ANY decent defragger.
>
>>>>>> but I am wondering what the name of it is.  Obviously you
>>>>>> don't mean the Windows Defrag.  What one do you use?
>
>>>>> I dont bother obsessively defragging all the time.
>
>>>> ok then, which do you use when you finally get around to defragging?
>
>>> I dont bother anymore. Very large FAT32 partitions dont get fragged
>>> enough to bother defragging them the way I use the system.
>
>> Ahem,
>
>Gotta throat problem have you ?


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> the way YOU use the system,
>
>You asked me what *I* use. At least TRY to keep up.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> not the way the average user does though.
>
>Complete tripe with that particular situation, particularly when
>there is lots of free space, the situation we were discussing,
>and because there is plenty of free space, the recycle bin
>is used for easy reversal of accidental deletions etc.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>Rest of your juvenile stuff flushed. Again.
>
>
>