🚀 go-pugleaf

Rod Speed wrote in message ...
>
>Aaron <chaaron@lave.net> wrote in message
>news:7q5qo1$cmv$1@mochi.lava.net...
>> Todd wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Hyper <jimb@snip.net> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Aaron <chaaron@lave.net> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote in message ...
>
>>>>>>>> And any decent defragger that doesnt mindless move around
>>>>>>>> static files, will do just as well with a single partition too. The
static
>>>>>>>> files just stay at the front of the drive and the stuff that
changes
>>>>>>>> ends up at the boundary between the used and free space.
>
>>>>>>> Rod, you have mentioned this "decent defragger" before,
>
>>>>>> I didnt mention any specific decent defragger,
>>>>>> I clearly said ANY decent defragger.
>
>>>>>>> but I am wondering what the name of it is.  Obviously you
>>>>>>> don't mean the Windows Defrag.  What one do you use?
>
>>>>>> I dont bother obsessively defragging all the time.
>
>>>>> ok then, which do you use when you finally get around to defragging?
>
>>>> I dont bother anymore. Very large FAT32 partitions dont get fragged
>>>> enough to bother defragging them the way I use the system.
>
>>> Which defragger *did* you use? Or are you going to dodge this too?
>
>> Exactly,
>
>Pathetic really. You clowns havent actually gotta clue to your names have
>you ? I'll got thru this just one more time, very very slowly for the
terminally
>comprehensionally challenged. And then I'll just ignore you stupid clowns.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> he makes all this noise about using a "decent defragger"
>> that puts all static files at the beginning of the drive,
>
>Never did anything of the sort. I just said that *IF* you are
>into obsessively defragging, THEN it makes sense to use a
>defragger that doesnt mindlessly move static files around on
>the drive but which concentrates them at the front of the drive,
>so the drive doesnt become quickly fragged again after a defrag.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> but now says he doesn't even defrag anymore.
>
>I said that all along too. You didnt manage
>to comprehend that either ? Your problem.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> Why was he bashing furiously at the keyboard
>> then, to talk about it, if he never uses it?
>
>I get to discuss anything I choose to boy. You dont approve ?  Your
problem.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.

>
>> I still would like to know what "decent defragger" he was thinking about.
>
>You have always been and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant.
>Specially when you cant manage to understand even the simplest stuff.


just the usual juvenile stuff that he always ends up resorting to.