🚀 go-pugleaf

This is a test only.

Dan G wrote:

> Ed,
> If you're not sure about the examples why do you claim the reward ;-x ?.
>
> Ed Prochak wrote in message <7qp68f$s67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> >
> >
> >So do you want us to compare SQL7 with Oracle 7.3 or can we use Oracle
> >8? (Let's see how can we compare SQL7 favorably to Oracle? I know,
> >we'll compare against the outdated version!)
> >
> >Regarding the "reward", I'm not sure what 5 examples I need to give.
> > Ones where the web page is wrong about Oracle? (To begin with, lots of
> >those ideas have been published before. They are not new.)
> >
> > Or ones where Oracle is better than SQL7? Given that I don't know as
> >much about SQL7, I guess I'm out of this one. 8^(
> >
> >Who's offering the reward money, you? How do I claim it?
> >
> >
> >
> >In article <7qoogi$h44$1@pollux.ip-plus.net>,
> >  "Dan G" <Gavrilescu.Daniel@pmintl.ch> wrote:
> >> Check this out first !:
> >> http://www.dbpd.com/vault/9801xtra.htm
> >>
> >> Second: I am not an Microsoft fan (even if I am using MS SQL).
> >>
> >> Allmost all Oracle commandments (applicable to SQL 7) doesn't need to
> >be
> >> applied with SQL 7 because the query optimizer is smart enough.
> >> Allmost all Oracle enhancemets (written in the article) apllied as
> >well with
> >> SQL 7.
> >> The one who can give more than 5 examples against the above
> >statements worth
> >> the prize ;-).
> >>
> >> All the best.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Ed Prochak
> >Magic Interface, Ltd.
> >ORACLE services
> >440-498-3700 <<<NOTE new number
> >
> >
> >Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> >Share what you know. Learn what you don't.