🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.freeware
Article #396

Re: Intuit and Symantec scams [Was: Quicken alternative?]

#396
From: Phred
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:37
44 lines
3083 bytes
[Note: Followups set to aus.computers as freeware not relevant.]

In article 
<44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, "Ryan 
Hayward" <ryanhayward@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>"Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
>news:4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net...
[snip]
>> Ah well, time to move on from NAV -- recommendations for an
>> alternative welcomed.  (But I long ago stopped trying to balance my
>> accounts, so Quicken is no longer an issue for me. :)
>
>I personally use Mcafee AV which has excellent real time protection. 
>However, scanning is slow and best done when you are not in front
>of the 'puter. A lot of people complain that it is a hog on resources but 
>compared to Norton, it uses considerably less. I use the firewall as well
>and no slowdown with opening programs. The only slowdown is when I first 
>startup windows, takes an extra minute on a Pentinum 4 3.07,  512 Ram.
>With Mcafee, you get 12 months of updates and not just virus definitions but 
>program components too.
>Haven't had any problems with the software but the initial update on my slow 
>56K connection took a little longer than an hour as the box copy was about a 
>year old...... ( mind you, it was the entire security suite I purchased )
>Virus definitions updates come around every day and are automatic and quick 
>to download.
>
>I used to use a combination of nod32, adwareplus & Zone Alarm Pro which took 
>up about the same resources. 

Thanks for the reply, Ryan.  I'm currently relying on the ADSL modem's 
firewall for that side of things.  Never tried those ad... things.  
Maybe I should get one to have a look around.  8-)

I've been considering Vet for the AV stuff.  Anyone like to comment?

I've used eTrust in another place.  It's *very* quick to scan things 
compared with my old NAV, and I assume it's pretty reliable (else why 
would a large Govt organisation use it?) but the "corporate" version 
is probably not all that cost-effective for a private citizen. :)

Cheers, Phred.

-- 
ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4jua5kF9nheeU2@individual.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <Xns98197C34AAD45chakolatehotmailcom@204.153.244.170> <4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net> <44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112049,7e678d9f026492c3
X-Google-Thread: 108c83,415a4e89fe70564a
X-Google-Attributes: gid112049,gid108c83,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,aus.computers
Subject: Re: Intuit and Symantec scams [Was: Quicken alternative?]
Followup-To: aus.computers
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:37:07 GMT
Organization: Just me
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <4jua5kF9nheeU2@individual.net>
References: <Xns98197C34AAD45chakolatehotmailcom@204.153.244.170> <4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net> <44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>
X-Trace: individual.net uyI4+3JGfl/CSzex1WN5CQv3B98DRe9V8rSV1SrRe2owxpWxpc
X-Orig-Path: Telstra
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01