Article View: alt.comp.freeware
Article #396Re: Intuit and Symantec scams [Was: Quicken alternative?]
From: Phred
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:37
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:37
44 lines
3083 bytes
3083 bytes
[Note: Followups set to aus.computers as freeware not relevant.] In article <44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>, "Ryan Hayward" <ryanhayward@iinet.net.au> wrote: >"Phred" <ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net... [snip] >> Ah well, time to move on from NAV -- recommendations for an >> alternative welcomed. (But I long ago stopped trying to balance my >> accounts, so Quicken is no longer an issue for me. :) > >I personally use Mcafee AV which has excellent real time protection. >However, scanning is slow and best done when you are not in front >of the 'puter. A lot of people complain that it is a hog on resources but >compared to Norton, it uses considerably less. I use the firewall as well >and no slowdown with opening programs. The only slowdown is when I first >startup windows, takes an extra minute on a Pentinum 4 3.07, 512 Ram. >With Mcafee, you get 12 months of updates and not just virus definitions but >program components too. >Haven't had any problems with the software but the initial update on my slow >56K connection took a little longer than an hour as the box copy was about a >year old...... ( mind you, it was the entire security suite I purchased ) >Virus definitions updates come around every day and are automatic and quick >to download. > >I used to use a combination of nod32, adwareplus & Zone Alarm Pro which took >up about the same resources. Thanks for the reply, Ryan. I'm currently relying on the ADSL modem's firewall for that side of things. Never tried those ad... things. Maybe I should get one to have a look around. 8-) I've been considering Vet for the AV stuff. Anyone like to comment? I've used eTrust in another place. It's *very* quick to scan things compared with my old NAV, and I assume it's pretty reliable (else why would a large Govt organisation use it?) but the "corporate" version is probably not all that cost-effective for a private citizen. :) Cheers, Phred. -- ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4jua5kF9nheeU2@individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<Xns98197C34AAD45chakolatehotmailcom@204.153.244.170> <4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net> <44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112049,7e678d9f026492c3 X-Google-Thread: 108c83,415a4e89fe70564a X-Google-Attributes: gid112049,gid108c83,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: ppnerkDELETETHIS@yahoo.com (Phred) Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,aus.computers Subject: Re: Intuit and Symantec scams [Was: Quicken alternative?] Followup-To: aus.computers Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:37:07 GMT Organization: Just me Lines: 45 Message-ID: <4jua5kF9nheeU2@individual.net> References: <Xns98197C34AAD45chakolatehotmailcom@204.153.244.170> <4ju017F9mas8U1@individual.net> <44d9d84c$0$25703$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> X-Trace: individual.net uyI4+3JGfl/CSzex1WN5CQv3B98DRe9V8rSV1SrRe2owxpWxpc X-Orig-Path: Telstra X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.01