🚀 go-pugleaf

Just don't think it right to reproach someone this way.  The right way would
be to redirect and encourage.  This is a public posting area and idiotic
post will happen, agreed.  It might be best to just ignore them.  I will
dream on as "old men have dreams and young men have visions" and I am a old
man. Time will tell if 1 Terahertz is possible and who's to say it won't be
a PR rating 1 Terahertz+ at 300GHz clock speed.  AMD marketing!!!!

"Chip" <anneonymouse@virgin.net> wrote in message 
news:2u6eacF25isf2U1@uni-berlin.de...
>I don't know why I am even commenting on this.  I'll probably regret it.
>
> "Rusty" <rlsmith004@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message 
> news:Atefd.10899$Al3.4445@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
>> Yes, Albert Einstein, the Wright Bro's, Bill Gates, Tomas Edison, just 
>> name a few.  Many others tried, but these few made it work.  All were 
>> told that "it will never work".
>
> My comment wasn't that "it will never work" (although that is true of 
> course).  Merely that Leo's was yet another idiotic post.  And forgive me, 
> but Leo and Albert Einstein are perhaps not in the same league are they.
>
>>  If the there were a liquid hydrogen cooling system at the cost of a 
>> water cooling system, I would buy it.
>
> And if the new Porsche GT3 was available for $3000, I'd buy that too. 
> Dream on.
>
>> Liquid nitrogen cooling systems have already been made for rack mounted 
>> server systems, although they cost a allot.
>
> And that's nitrogen.  Liquid hydrogen cooled would be even worse.  Let 
> alone the safety implications.
>
>>  There have also been experiments with total liquid bath systems in a 
>> non-conductive fluid cooled with liquid nitrogen, which worked.
>
> You forgot the word "badly".    ..... system is a non-conductive fluid 
> cooled with liquid nitrogen, which worked BADLY.
>
> Although its incredibly cold, the fluid can't conduct the heat away fast 
> enough and the whole system becomes unstable in a matter of minutes.
>
>> A PC in an liquid tight container.  Imagine a PC at -160�C and no 
>> condensation problems because it's in a liquid in a sealed container, 
>> cool. Call it a LPC after LCD.
>
> I'm afraid I can't see that working, even if it was cost effective, which 
> it would never be.
>
> I am not sure we will ever see 1 TeraHertz (i.e. 1000 GigaHertz) 
> processors with the current silicon-based technology.  Perhaps with 0.1 
> micron components it may be possible, but I doubt it.  And anyway, that's 
> nearly 10 times better than the current state-of-the-art.
>
> Chip
>
>>
>> "Chip" <anneonymouse@virgin.net> wrote in message 
>> news:2u4rbvF257aifU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>> "Karl-Hugo Weesberg" <netspider4@lycos.com> wrote in message 
>>> news:7666ed5f.0410250017.484ee3fc@posting.google.com...
>>>> You just need a liquid hydrogen cooling system!
>>>
>>> Yawn.  There's one born every minute, isn't there.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>