Article View: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd
Article #98Re: AMD cpus can be faster than 1 TeraHertz!
From: Chip
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:58
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:58
58 lines
3272 bytes
3272 bytes
I don't know why I am even commenting on this. I'll probably regret it. "Rusty" <rlsmith004@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:Atefd.10899$Al3.4445@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > Yes, Albert Einstein, the Wright Bro's, Bill Gates, Tomas Edison, just > name a few. Many others tried, but these few made it work. All were told > that "it will never work". My comment wasn't that "it will never work" (although that is true of course). Merely that Leo's was yet another idiotic post. And forgive me, but Leo and Albert Einstein are perhaps not in the same league are they. > If the there were a liquid hydrogen cooling system at the cost of a water > cooling system, I would buy it. And if the new Porsche GT3 was available for $3000, I'd buy that too. Dream on. > Liquid nitrogen cooling systems have already been made for rack mounted > server systems, although they cost a allot. And that's nitrogen. Liquid hydrogen cooled would be even worse. Let alone the safety implications. > There have also been experiments with total liquid bath systems in a > non-conductive fluid cooled with liquid nitrogen, which worked. You forgot the word "badly". ..... system is a non-conductive fluid cooled with liquid nitrogen, which worked BADLY. Although its incredibly cold, the fluid can't conduct the heat away fast enough and the whole system becomes unstable in a matter of minutes. > A PC in an liquid tight container. Imagine a PC at -160�C and no > condensation problems because it's in a liquid in a sealed container, > cool. Call it a LPC after LCD. I'm afraid I can't see that working, even if it was cost effective, which it would never be. I am not sure we will ever see 1 TeraHertz (i.e. 1000 GigaHertz) processors with the current silicon-based technology. Perhaps with 0.1 micron components it may be possible, but I doubt it. And anyway, that's nearly 10 times better than the current state-of-the-art. Chip > > "Chip" <anneonymouse@virgin.net> wrote in message > news:2u4rbvF257aifU1@uni-berlin.de... >> "Karl-Hugo Weesberg" <netspider4@lycos.com> wrote in message >> news:7666ed5f.0410250017.484ee3fc@posting.google.com... >>> You just need a liquid hydrogen cooling system! >> >> Yawn. There's one born every minute, isn't there. >> > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2u6eacF25isf2U1@uni-berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mailReferences:
<7666ed5f.0410250017.484ee3fc@posting.google.com> <2u4rbvF257aifU1@uni-berlin.de> <Atefd.10899$Al3.4445@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: faad6,251ef651a9942080 X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,251ef651a9942080 X-Google-Attributes: gidfaad6,gidf4f6f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Chip" <anneonymouse@virgin.net> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,can.uucp Subject: Re: AMD cpus can be faster than 1 TeraHertz! Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:58:30 +0100 Lines: 60 Message-ID: <2u6eacF25isf2U1@uni-berlin.de> References: <7666ed5f.0410250017.484ee3fc@posting.google.com> <2u4rbvF257aifU1@uni-berlin.de> <Atefd.10899$Al3.4445@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de OfXzEvusqg5BOODYV797lwn9LnVzeXLq1XcSeCVZtSQCYx68/Z X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180