🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 21:07:24 GMT, kony <spam@spam.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:29:04 GMT, Curious George
><cg@email.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>You're acting a bit like a spoiled child that keeps whining
>>>because it didn't get his/her way.
>>
>>Don't project what your therapist tells you on me.  go ahead & rant &
>>rant & rant.  Fact is there is no conceptual difference between "most"
>>& dominant.  
>
>
>Funny, many people do realize there is.  Do you have access
>to a dictionary?

You're kidding, right?

Sure there _can_ be a difference between "most" & "dominant" but that
depends on context.  When you make an unqualified generalization about
businesses (which logically groups everybody into 1 market) & try to
characterize market share of 2, maybe 3, big desktop OS players (which
take up basically the whole pie) & 1 of which you characterize as
"dominant"- that potential for distinction goes out the window.

Do you understand the difference between paraphrasing and a direct
quote?  I'm not so sure you didn't call Win98 "dominant" at some point
in that thread.  It doesn't matter here though.  At least you're done
an _awfully_ poor job of explaining how it could be possible.

>>You are the one who has to back up your unfounded
>>statements & write them clearly.  I'm not here to do your work.
>
>Of course not, you're here to troll around and argue.

You sure you want to go there?  Like YOUR hands are clean?


Try to throw stones if you like.  I only noted you contradicted
yourself.  I've made no claims about market share or "total quantity"
or "dominance" of either OS here.  I don't _need_ to cite a survey to
prove you've contradicted yourself.   Your writing does the work.  

It's absurd you HAD to Shoot down "Black Adder" that way when
_you_admit_ you don't even have the data to make that statement - and
then try to back peddle when you're called out with basically sloppy
writing & poor analogy (I'm being generous).  Cry to mommy when your
goofs are found instead of wasting bandwidth.

>>Silly rabbit I _DO_ get my way when you continue to prove &
>>corroborate my points & observations over & over.
>
>Have a nice day.

I did .  Then I paused for a moment to chuckle at your expense.

Sigh