Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #1201Re: Install win xp over a network
From: Rod Speed
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:58
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 22:58
160 lines
6712 bytes
6712 bytes
Some Guy <Some@Guy.com> wrote in message news:42C8555F.3F99B21@Guy.com... > David Maynard wrote >>> The fact of the matter is that the main >>> benefit of TCP/IP is that it's routable.. >> Ain't no 'little' thing. > ------------- > NetBEUI (NetBIOS Extended User Interface) is a new, > extended version of NetBIOS lets computers communicate > within a local area network. NetBEUI is the best performance > choice for communication within a single LAN. Mindless pig ignorant drivel. > It does not support the routing of messages to other networks. So its well past its useby date now. > It is recommended to install both NetBEUI and TCP/IP in each > computer and set the server up to use NetBEUI for communication > within the LAN and TCP/IP for communication beyond the LAN. Only by pig ignorant uniwankers that dont have a fucking clue. > http://cob.bloomu.edu/afundaburk/personal/NBEA%20-%20Let's%20Go%20Wireless%20Presentation.ppt > ----------- > Look people. Get fucked, animal. > Microsoft has a single over-riding agenda - > to make money (like most corporations). Nothing what so ever to do with dropping NETBEUI. > However, their main product (desktop OS's) > aren't like most consumer goods (ie like a car). You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist fuckwits ? > How do you know when an OS is "worn out" ? It doesnt do what you want to do as well as a better OS, fuckwit. > Well, for Microsoft (which is really (in the real world) the only > game in town when it comes to OS's) they can call the shots > to some degree by forcing the obselence of older os's by forcing > certain new technologies into the market (the migration from > Win-95 to Win-98 was coaxed by such things as USB and FAT-32). Utterly mindless pig ignorant conspiracy theory. The reality is that extra stuff is added as it become useful, FAT32 when the limitations of FAT16 become a significant limitation as hard drives get bigger etc. With USB support, it was completely redone with Win98 and as a result of that works a lot better than it ever did with Win95. > This is really just another way to say that a good deal of the > claimed differences between different versions of Windows > is marketing bullshit designed to instill a degree of psycological > bias against the older OS. It creates a notion that the older > OS is "worn out" in an almost physical way. Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never ever had a fucking clue. Have fun explaining how come even Linux keeps adding extra capability. > The other aspect of what Microsoft does is to gear Windows first > and formost towards their best paying customer - that being large > corporations (and the gov't). They want work-station security, they > want (need) routable protocals, they want remote administration > capability, they want permission-based user hirarchies. So Windows > (2K and XP) comes "out of the box" with all sorts of services and > ports configured as active by default. Because more and more personal users need that stuff, most obviously with multiple users per PC and multiple PCs per house etc. > Which leads to the next point: > Microsoft values reducing the need for customer > support far more than workstation security. And thats what most personal desktop users want too, fuckwit. > The default settings for 2K and XP are set to be most > appropriate for a large corporation (with IT staff and fire-wall). Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never ever had a fucking clue. > For the small company or home user, XP is (and > was) a disaster in terms of viral and trojan infections. Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never ever had a fucking clue. > What's this got to do with NetBEUI vs TCP/IP? Nothing. > It's Microsoft's "keep it simple stupid" mentality. Wrong. NETBEUI is much simpler than TCP/IP, if they actually did go for simplicity, they'd have kept it, stupid. > If TCP will work everywhere on a network (large, small, across routers, etc) And hordes of personal systems have that stuff now, stupid. > then it becomes the default protocal and bye bye NetBEUI. Its a protocol, not a 'protocal', you pig ignorant clown. > It will mean fewer support calls for MS from fortune 500 companies. They dont do support that way, fuckwit. > It doesn't mean NetBEUI is bad or inferior It is anyway. > (it seems it may have a performance edge on small networks vs TCP, Wrong. > and it certainly has a security edge over TCP). Wrong. > It just means MS made a decision motivated by making their life simpler. Wrong. > I'm sure a big part of it was to force some degree of incompatibility > between exiting networks (with NT4 servers) which would force > those systems into the garbage in favor of XP-pro. Yet another utterly mindless conspiracy theory. > It's funny how jaded we all pretty much are towards Microsoft the > corporate pirahna fish that they are, how they use strong-arm tactics > to kill competition, yet we let their mantra of OS obselescence sink > into our heads exactly according to their plan. Yet another utterly mindless conspiracy theory. >> Remove it and you've got an antiquated, severely limited, protocol. > As if TCP/IP isin't "antiquated". Pathetic, really.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ir8vvFmuko4U1@individual.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <stkdc19egceetqcmeipbslcsg5ssn2q7a9@4ax.com> <11ceovm1q8rbafc@corp.supernews.com> <4crec15k5j63euhgt75i4git3605r5a26v@4ax.com> <11cf24flg4pbl4a@corp.supernews.com> <42C8555F.3F99B21@Guy.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: f70d1,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Thread: 108c83,ea7de1b713e27c5b X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,gidf70d1,gid10a2ed,gid108c83,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,aus.computers,comp.hardware Subject: Re: Install win xp over a network Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:58:50 +1000 Lines: 162 Message-ID: <3ir8vvFmuko4U1@individual.net> References: <da5i0p$jod$1@bagan.srce.hr> <42C69324.E7CE4F55@Guy.com> <11cdei2sde3uhf3@corp.supernews.com> <stkdc19egceetqcmeipbslcsg5ssn2q7a9@4ax.com> <11ceovm1q8rbafc@corp.supernews.com> <4crec15k5j63euhgt75i4git3605r5a26v@4ax.com> <11cf24flg4pbl4a@corp.supernews.com> <42C8555F.3F99B21@Guy.com> X-Trace: individual.net jciotOZvCyJxmfU6CYRACg600kbyy2/SbV444BspxumC8bfoA= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180