🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #3592

Re: OEM BIOS update vs. Intel

#3592
From: Mark Hannon
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:47
26 lines
2616 bytes
Lonsway -

It is possible.  I did the same thing with a PD440FX in a Toshiba Infinia a
couple of years ago.  I got the info on how to do it on the Intel motherboard
newsgroup.  I think I still have some of the messages archived if you'd like me
to email them to you (don't want to clutter this newsgroup).  Let me know.

Mark Hannon
MarkHannon@worldnet.att.net


Lonsway wrote:

> I am trying to update the BIOS on my Micron XRU PII 266mhz with the Intel
> PD440FX motherboard.  I'm currently running ver 1.00.03.DT05 which is the
> most recent update offered by Micron.  I was able to flash this without a
> problem.
>
> Intel offers ver 1.00.09.DT0_ for the board but I cannot get it to complete
> the flash process.  I get an L05 error about not being able to initiate
> erase.  Intel's sight indicates their updates may not work on OEM boards.
> Both updates use IFLASH.
>
> Any workarounds for how I can the the Intel version to flash?  Does the DT0_
> vs. the DT05 designation have any meaning?   Any help would be appreciated.
> Thanks.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3AA18266.4214471C@worldnet.att.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news-out-sjo.usenetserver.com!europa.netcrusader.net!204.127.161.3!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <MMkn6.4966$DY.2300108@news1.mntp1.il.home.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10bf1a,2543b489676e0cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf1a,public
X-Google-Thread: f5f89,2543b489676e0cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public
X-Google-Thread: f4d34,2543b489676e0cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d34,public
X-Google-Thread: f583c,2543b489676e0cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf583c,public
X-Google-Thread: 112149,2543b489676e0cc9
X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-03 15:48:06 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news-out-sjo.usenetserver.com!europa.netcrusader.net!204.127.161.3!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.72!wnfilter2!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3AA18266.4214471C@worldnet.att.net>
From: Mark Hannon <MarkHannon@worldnet.att.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard,alt.sys.pc-clone.micron,comp.hardware,intel.motherboards.pentium_ii
Subject: Re: OEM BIOS update vs. Intel
References: <MMkn6.4966$DY.2300108@news1.mntp1.il.home.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:47:41 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.86.156.79
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 983663261 12.86.156.79 (Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:47:41 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:47:41 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet