Article View: alt.comp.hardware
Article #3591Re: OEM BIOS update vs. Intel
From: Ben Myers
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 23:01
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 23:01
53 lines
3518 bytes
3518 bytes
Pat, See below, in response to your questions... "Lonsway" <lonsway@home.com> wrote: >No, I'm not afraid to mess with this BIOS, really!!! > >Ben, extremely informative note. Could I bother you for more input? You just did. :) No problem. > >-When you refer to making the mobo useless, are you saying I couldn't even >recover it with a boot disk and earlier version? There is a small chance that you won't be able to recover the old BIOS. >-Any input on the following BIOS recovery procedure provided in another >response? Is this what you refer to by "hacking" into the BIOS? >http://developer.intel.com/design/motherbd/standardbios.htm#6 Actually, if you want to go thru the white-knuckle BIOS recovery procedure, that is one way to get the 1.00.09.DT0 BIOS into the board, short-circuiting the safeguards built into IFLASH. I forgot about this approach. I find the BIOS recovery to be spooky, because all you hear are beeps, with nothing displayed on screen. In the past, I have gone so far as to hand-edit the BIOS strings to match the BIOS on a motherboard, using a text editor. > >As far as why I'm updating, I have an Intel revision list detailing 01-09. >Many changes along the way. Most compelling: 07 and above support HDs> >8.4gb and the CPU upgrade I plan to install reportedly has issues with DT05. >Additionally, I would like to discontinue the use of the OnTrack disk >overlay as part of my continual process-of-elimination when troubleshooting >other problems I'm experiencing. Lastly, I am assuming the Micron version >corresponds with Intel's version. I have verified my current 03DT05 does >not support HDs over 8.4gb. I've sent Micron a note asking them to clarify. Those are good reasons to upgrade the motherboard BIOS and get more mileage out of the board. It's likely that the Micron revision numbers correspond with Intel's. Don't hold your breath waiting for Micron to respond. They'll probably only tell you that if you flash the board with a generic Intel BIOS, then your warranty is toast. Which it probably is anyway, given the age of the board... Ben > >Thanks for the feedback. -Pat > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3a9ed311.31169058@news.ma.ultranet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!howland.erols.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mailReferences:
<MMkn6.4966$DY.2300108@news1.mntp1.il.home.com> <3a9e5f1e.1494069@news.ma.ultranet.com> <YNwn6.5352$DY.2422865@news1.mntp1.il.home.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10bf1a,2543b489676e0cc9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bf1a,public X-Google-Thread: f4d34,2543b489676e0cc9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d34,public X-Google-Thread: f5f89,2543b489676e0cc9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public X-Google-Thread: 112149,2543b489676e0cc9 X-Google-Attributes: gid112149,public X-Google-Thread: f583c,2543b489676e0cc9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf583c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-01 15:04:06 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!howland.erols.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!not-for-mail From: benmyers@ultranet.com (Ben Myers) Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.periphs.mainboard,alt.sys.pc-clone.micron,comp.hardware,intel.motherboards.pentium_ii Subject: Re: OEM BIOS update vs. Intel Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 23:01:59 GMT Lines: 54 Message-ID: <3a9ed311.31169058@news.ma.ultranet.com> References: <MMkn6.4966$DY.2300108@news1.mntp1.il.home.com> <3a9e5f1e.1494069@news.ma.ultranet.com> <YNwn6.5352$DY.2422865@news1.mntp1.il.home.com> X-Trace: UmFuZG9tSVZIeBPucd5azvBRisD5vFSWkGhPQuO6M943Z4yuddRTEgCrRZBG0WRd X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2001 23:02:51 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/16.235