Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr
Article #672Re: Master/Slave
From: Michael Price
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00
14 lines
1567 bytes
1567 bytes
I think you will have to jumper one of them as a Master, and I seem to remember someone on the forum some time ago recommending the CDRW as the master. However, I have not had any problems with them either way. Sunny wrote: > Thanks, using Win 98SE and replacing both. Both drives are set to "slave" by default from the factory. Just wanted to know if it makes a performance difference> > > "Derek" <spamtrap@leder.com.au> wrote in message news:8f1dosc2rst0fbsvn5doua2suemt84rlnm@4ax.com... > | Win9x doesn't care, but NT must have a master > | > | On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 14:52:35 +1000, "Sunny" <bevtez@hotmail.com> wrote: > | > | >Does it make any difference to have the CDROM/CDRW as master/slave on the second controller, or is should it be CDRW/CDROM Master/Slave? (two Hard drives on the Primary Controller) > |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3986BC30.18A721F1@ozemail.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<QLth5.22491$c5.62523@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <8f1dosc2rst0fbsvn5doua2suemt84rlnm@4ax.com> <bGvh5.22567$c5.62599@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d683,7fa66c5929fbddee X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public X-Google-Thread: 10f3c1,7fa66c5929fbddee X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3c1,public From: Michael Price <mice@ozemail.com.au> Subject: Re: Master/Slave Date: 2000/08/01 Message-ID: <3986BC30.18A721F1@ozemail.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 653168879 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <QLth5.22491$c5.62523@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <8f1dosc2rst0fbsvn5doua2suemt84rlnm@4ax.com> <bGvh5.22567$c5.62599@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: 1 Aug 2000 21:55:53 +1000, 203.101.95.181 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr,aus.computers.ibm-pc