Re: Master/Slave

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.cdr

Article #673

Back to alt.comp.periphs.cdr Previous Next

#673

From: Kirk
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00

15 lines
1049 bytes

In article <QLth5.22491$c5.62523@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>, 
bevtez@hotmail.com says...
> Does it make any difference to have the CDROM/CDRW as master/slave on =
> the second controller, or is should it be CDRW/CDROM Master/Slave? (two =
> Hard drives on the Primary Controller)
> 
> 

Some burners (the TDK, for one) will have to be the master.

-- 
Kirk
"Nothing is foolproof. Fools are too ingenious" -RAH

<I really am at home if you want to reply by e-mail>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MPG.13f07d46564b463a989c3b@news.mindspring.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <QLth5.22491$c5.62523@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,7fa66c5929fbddee
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f3c1,7fa66c5929fbddee
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3c1,public
From: Kirk <kirkdarlingnotathome@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Master/Slave
Date: 2000/08/01
Message-ID: <MPG.13f07d46564b463a989c3b@news.mindspring.com>
X-Deja-AN: 653177122
References: <QLth5.22491$c5.62523@newsfeeds.bigpond.com>
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
X-Server-Date: 1 Aug 2000 12:25:22 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.cdr,aus.computers.ibm-pc

Reply to Parent Message