Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner

Article #41

Back to alt.comp.periphs.scanner Previous Next

#41

From: �p ��
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00

27 lines
1507 bytes

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 22:17:31 +0800, "VIP" <vip@poboxes.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a parallel
>port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo
>scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is
>not such a problem.
>
>UMAX 1220P
>
>CANON FB610
FB610 ���o��ի��H
>
>Any known problems of the two?
>
>Anyone has got better ones to suggest?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Please email vip@poboxes.com
>
>



�p�ڤ�

Technical Details

Message-ID: <36083339.2485510@news.netvigator.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e07b,public
X-Google-Thread: f4db5,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4db5,public
X-Google-Thread: 104579,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid104579,public
X-Google-Thread: 109e38,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public
From: siuba@hotmail.com-_- (�p �� ��)
Subject: Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Date: 1998/09/14
Message-ID: <36083339.2485510@news.netvigator.com>
X-Deja-AN: 391011725
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Organization: �J����W��
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner,aus.computers.ibm-pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,hk.comp.pc,tw.bbs.comp.hardware

Reply to Parent Message