Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.scanner

Article #42

Back to alt.comp.periphs.scanner Previous Next

#42

From: Scheldon Pereira
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00

29 lines
1567 bytes

Another brand to look at is the Optic Pro 9636T Scanner, it has 600x1200dpi
as well as a Transparency adapter which you can scan slides and negatives.
RRP is $299 for it.
 

VIP <vip@poboxes.com> wrote in article <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>...
> Hello,
> 
> I am looking for a reasonably priced 600x1200 dpi scanner. I need a
parallel
> port scanner. Which one of the two are better? I mainly use it for photo
> scanning. I am looking for good color accuracy, high resolution. Speed is
> not such a problem.
> 
> UMAX 1220P
> 
> CANON FB610
> 
> Any known problems of the two?
> 
> Anyone has got better ones to suggest?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Please email vip@poboxes.com
> 
> 
> 
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01bde09d$96277ee0$64646464@amd>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10d683,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d683,public
X-Google-Thread: f4db5,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4db5,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e07b,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e07b,public
X-Google-Thread: 104579,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid104579,public
X-Google-Thread: 109e38,12a2bdb5e8fad2e9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public
From: "Scheldon Pereira" <srper1hotshot@ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: scanners: Canon FB610, UMAX 1220P, which one is better?
Date: 1998/09/15
Message-ID: <01bde09d$96277ee0$64646464@amd>
X-Deja-AN: 391316164
References: <6tj8fm$mdd$1@news.iinet.net.au>
Organization: OzEmail Ltd.
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.scanner,aus.computers.ibm-pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,hk.comp.pc,tw.bbs.comp.hardware

Reply to Parent Message