Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox

Article #48

Back to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox Previous Next

#48

From: Stuffed Crust
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00

17 lines
2098 bytes

In alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia COMPUTER VILLAGE <INFO@computer-village.com> wrote:
> Hey Rick...I dont doubt that your expertise is somewhere out there, but R u
> gonna tell us that the POC that the Athlon chip offers is more stable than a
> solid Dual 600EB u gotta be smokin some good ass shi* ...anyways next time
> limit your responses to your Athlon partners...by the way I could take any Dual
> Athlon if it exists and smoke it with any PIII chip even lower in
> MHz...(remember that Windows is based on the Pentium architecture not the AMD
> -and the RISC instructions, one that by the way was not even in anyone's head
> at the time that P and W were making money out of us...   ;-)

I direct you to www.tomshardware.com -- he has many things to demonstrate 
that the Athlons whip the P3's ass.  Period.

The only way Intel is better than AMD is that there are no SMP-capable 
Athlon boards out at the moment.  Though that will change by December.

 - Pizza

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8upa9l$u3l$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com> <3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
From: Stuffed Crust <pizza@fucktheusers.org>
Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
Date: 2000/11/13
Message-ID: <8upa9l$u3l$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>
X-Deja-AN: 693150088
Approved: fluffi
Sender: Stuffed Crust <pizza@pizzahut.shaftnet.org>
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com> <3A101FC5.18C8BA54@COMPUTER-VILLAGE.COM>
Organization: Tower of Issues
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.18pre18 (i586))
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia

Reply to Parent Message