🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox
Article #49

Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?

#49
From: ME
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 00:00
64 lines
3329 bytes
"RMS" <rsavoie1@Kiss.my.grits.spammer.home.com> wrote in message
news:oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com...
> Thanks for your opinion. Since I think you are totally wrong about
virtually
> everything, I'll let everybody know how it really works (IMNSHO).
>
> I have 3 systems, Athlon 800Mhz, PIII 550Mhz, and a K6-2 400Mhz (Enough of
> that.). I have been actually working in computer maintenance/network admin
> at a site that has 1200 clients for several years now (No MSCE,  ABCD, or
> anything else like that.).

I know many large network admins that know nothing about computers or
software beyond their own little world...and I wouldn't let them anywhere
near any of my systems. So that statement doesn't mean anything as far as
bolstering your opinion....although I'm sure your qualified.

>
> Facts:
> 1) Dual processor systems are for systems that run multiple applications
at
> the same time, anything else is a waste of CPU processing power. (The
> exception of course is high end servers with OS's that have real
symetrical
> processing, at the kernel level, like Solaris or IBM AIX.

No longer true...games exist and are being developed to take advantage of
dual processors.

> 2) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to any Unix OS (Just ask a real
> administrator.) unless your main goal is to have everything automated and
> "who cares about performance".

Your opinion...of course NT outsells all current software of its type and
has been used to replace many unix systems. Although I do like unix, I also
like NT.

> 3) Win NT is a joke of an OS compared to Win 98 for playing games (This
may
> be changing with Directx 8.0).

True. Although the next generation of NT/2000 will probably change all that.

> 4) Hayes modem - Not,
>  Netgear NIC - Not,
>  Intel PIII CPU - Not,
>  Creative DVD - Not !

> 5) USR modem - Modem?

 hmmmm is that one of those old communication devises?

>  3Com NIC - Yes,

I...and many others..hate these resource pigs. :)

>  AMD Athlon CPU, - Yes

Hmmm newer thunderbirds seem to have solved the many problems with this chip
and it's MB's

>  Pioneer DVD - Yes !

Yes
Technical Details
Message-ID: <yJXP5.79061$x6.1593323@news20.bellglobal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,95c5e78d71aa7610
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
From: "ME" <staple_@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why (NOT) Win2k for gaming ?
Date: 2000/11/13
Message-ID: <yJXP5.79061$x6.1593323@news20.bellglobal.com>
X-Deja-AN: 693191793
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com> <8F0EAFB6Agrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <8F0F680ADLondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <8F0FEC6ACgrinchhomecom@24.64.2.57> <974120262.409.0.nnrp-02.c1ed3851@news.demon.co.uk> <oyTP5.37386$4U6.1886082@news1.rdc2.on.home.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Trace: news20.bellglobal.com 974145502 142.177.221.174 (Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:58:22 EST)
Organization: Sympatico
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:58:22 EST
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia