Re: Why Win2k for gaming ?

Article View: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox

Article #66

Back to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox Previous Next

#66

From: Ricket
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00

24 lines
1160 bytes

Tony (Tony) wrote in <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com>:

>
>Dual processor support.
OK.

>Scalability.

Could you please explain ?

>Native encryption.

This too please ?


>Speed.

Win2K is faster than Win95 ?
By how much ?
Any benchmark refs ?


Thanks
ricket

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8F0F6B744LondonCalling@164.128.36.42>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ec8c,783c81b2c281762f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ec8c,public
X-Google-Thread: feaeb,783c81b2c281762f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeaeb,public
X-Google-Thread: fb51b,783c81b2c281762f
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb51b,public
From: root@[127.0.0.1] (Ricket)
Subject: Re: Why Win2k for gaming ?
Date: 2000/04/07
Message-ID: <8F0F6B744LondonCalling@164.128.36.42>
X-Deja-AN: 607901756
References: <8F0E6E9F3LondonCalling@164.128.36.42> <13joessvpjet7g4sc4a2ob3napvktcu3bj@4ax.com>
X-Complaints-To: news@ip-plus.net
X-Trace: pollux.ip-plus.net 955093466 23125 146.159.185.3 (7 Apr 2000 07:44:26 GMT)
Organization: Your Company
User-Agent: Xnews/Y2K-SE
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Apr 2000 07:44:26 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox,3dfx.products.voodoo2,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia

Reply to Parent Message