Article View: alt.comp
Article #136Re: Which 40gb, 7200rpm HDD?
From: Mike
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 01:00
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 01:00
28 lines
2895 bytes
2895 bytes
I've always been a Maxtor ( http://www.taconuts.com/reviews/2000/dec/2/page1.php ) fan myself. They are cheap and have been fairly reliable. -Mike Ribfeast wrote: > > Had two IBM 30 gig 75GXP's go wierd on me the last few weeks, one had bad > sectors and was replaced under warranty, the other suffered a track > misalignment (fixed by a low level format). Watch the cooling in your > computers guys as this can hurry the track misalignment (head heats up). > Also have an IBM 60GXP 40GB here running no problems. Due to the problems > with my IBM drives I bought a pair of 60 gig Seagate Barracuda IV's and set > them up as a RAID 0 config. Dead quiet, absolutely no noise at all during > seeks. Benches around 65MB/sec on sequential transfers on the RAID. The IBMs > have slightly better seek times than the Seagates, but not enough to be too > worried about. I'll stick to Seagate from now on until good user reports of > the next series of IBM drives trickle in :) > > JNIK wrote: > > > I was planning on going for the IBM Deskstar60GXP 41.1GB to accompany my > > asus a7m266 mobo but have heard alot of reports lately that they are having > > alot of troubles with this drive, has anybody got any alternatives they can > > recommend to me? > > cheers > > JNIK
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3BB51D29.864ED9A@Address.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.uidaho.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<9onkb4$r2$1@neptunium.btinternet.com> <3BB51A29.D0F68D51@mac.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1063f0,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gid1063f0,public X-Google-Thread: f70d1,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gidf70d1,public X-Google-Thread: 103e02,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gid103e02,public X-Google-Thread: f42b5,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gidf42b5,public X-Google-Thread: 108c83,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gid108c83,public X-Google-Thread: f5f89,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5f89,public X-Google-Thread: f5142,811f7652391a3910 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5142,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-28 18:00:27 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.orst.edu!news.uidaho.edu!not-for-mail From: Mike <Email@Address.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp,alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,alt.computer,aus.computers,uk.comp.homebuilt,uk.comp.misc Subject: Re: Which 40gb, 7200rpm HDD? Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:00:25 -0700 Organization: University of Idaho Lines: 28 Message-ID: <3BB51D29.864ED9A@Address.com> References: <9onkb4$r2$1@neptunium.btinternet.com> <3BB51A29.D0F68D51@mac.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sub40-68.labs.uidaho.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: kestrel.csrv.uidaho.edu 1001725225 28465 129.101.5.17 (29 Sep 2001 01:00:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@uidaho.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Sep 2001 01:00:25 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en