🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.consumers
Article #273

Re: Clinton's TV Rage

#273
From: Wordsmith
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:13
83 lines
5032 bytes
Rod Speed wrote:
> Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote
> > Rod Speed wrote
> >> Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote
> >>> bearclaw@cruller.invalid wrote
>
> >>>> Who wouldn't be pissed off after all this:
>
> >>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXNCLbsBIfM&eurl=>
>
> >>>> It is a 10-minute-long MSNBC investigative report examining
> >>>> Condoleeza Rice's claim that the incoming Bush administration did
> >>>> not receive any plan or details from Clinton regarding Al Quaeda
> >>>> and Osama bin Laden. Its sources are: declassified intelligence
> >>>> reports, the 9/11 Commission Report, and reports from people who
> >>>> were there at the time.
>
> >>>> Warning: don't bother watching this if you are determined to ignore
> >>>> the unprincipled depths Condi must plumb to serve President Bush.
> >>>> For her to lie to us the way she did just days ago is nothing less
> >>>> than... well, whorish.
>
> >>>> The Bush administration got urgent top secret reports about Al
> >>>> Quaeda and OBL on January 25th, 2001-- five days after taking the
> >>>> Oath of Office.
>
> >>>> Bush's response? He downgraded counter-terrorism from a
> >>>> Cabinet-level policy concern,handing it over to deputy secretaries.
>
> >>>> This means that briefs on counter-terrorism and strategies to
> >>>> defeat such organisms as Al Quaeda never reached the Executive
> >>>> Office, delayed by months and sometimes permanently, in favor of
> >>>> such issues as "missile defense shields", tax reduction and other
> >>>> such expensive purely political strategies.
>
> >>>> (You gotta hand it to Bush, though: he sure likes to spend money
> >>>> that isn't his.)
>
> >>>> Bush continued on in this vein, even when in February, 2001, he
> >>>> found out definitively that the Cole had been attacked by Al
> >>>> Quaeda. By then though, when he wasn't on vacation, he was deep
> >>>> into his plan for convincing the nation to invade Iraq.
> >>>> Counter-terrorism grew ever more obscure as a national policy
> >>>> concern, right up to 9/11.
>
> >>>> I don't know why this stuff still surprises me. I've hated Bush and
> >>>> his cohorts for a long time for what they've done to the nation.
> >>>> You would think I would be too jaded to be surprised anymore.
>
> >>>> Yet somehow, I still can't believe any President could be this
> >>>> shamefully bad and continue in office.
>
> >>> It's possible Wallace and Clinton conspired to ham
> >>> it up for the audience to make them both look good.
>
> >> Mindless conspiracy theory.
>
> >> It isnt the first time Slick has done something like that. He
> >> got completely rabid when they were more interested in him
> >> getting his dick sucked than the world events at that time.
>
> > Still haven't mastered basic reading skills, have you, Rod?
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
>
> > To reiterate: I said it was *possible*; I did not say it was so.
>
> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
>
> >>> Stranger things have happened.
>
> >> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland.
>
> > Which drug would that be?
>
> Who knows ?  Who cares in spades.

You yourself presumed to know, otherwise your "Only in your pathetic
little drug crazed fantasyland" makes no sense. Reading skills pay,
Rod. So does logic.  

W : )
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1159575206.476182.86950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <bearclaw-E76E02.02334429092006@news.supernews.com> <1159565721.264839.220480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <4o5kemFd1ajnU1@individual.net> <1159573479.901170.28690@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,25ff24737bce8f72
X-Google-Thread: 11474a,25ff24737bce8f72
X-Google-Thread: 106595,25ff24737bce8f72
X-Google-Thread: 107518,25ff24737bce8f72
X-Google-Thread: f6c48,25ff24737bce8f72
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid11474a,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living
Subject: Re: Clinton's TV Rage
Date: 29 Sep 2006 17:13:26 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <1159575206.476182.86950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
References: <bearclaw-E76E02.02334429092006@news.supernews.com>
   <1159565721.264839.220480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
   <4o5kemFd1ajnU1@individual.net>
   <1159573479.901170.28690@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
   <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 168.253.19.7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159575211 29905 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2006 00:13:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:13:31 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=168.253.19.7;
   posting-account=QvbdcwwAAADU9SfInrhceZEuUI_nCW4W