Article View: alt.consumers
Article #273Re: Clinton's TV Rage
From: Wordsmith
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:13
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:13
83 lines
5032 bytes
5032 bytes
Rod Speed wrote: > Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote > > Rod Speed wrote > >> Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote > >>> bearclaw@cruller.invalid wrote > > >>>> Who wouldn't be pissed off after all this: > > >>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXNCLbsBIfM&eurl=> > > >>>> It is a 10-minute-long MSNBC investigative report examining > >>>> Condoleeza Rice's claim that the incoming Bush administration did > >>>> not receive any plan or details from Clinton regarding Al Quaeda > >>>> and Osama bin Laden. Its sources are: declassified intelligence > >>>> reports, the 9/11 Commission Report, and reports from people who > >>>> were there at the time. > > >>>> Warning: don't bother watching this if you are determined to ignore > >>>> the unprincipled depths Condi must plumb to serve President Bush. > >>>> For her to lie to us the way she did just days ago is nothing less > >>>> than... well, whorish. > > >>>> The Bush administration got urgent top secret reports about Al > >>>> Quaeda and OBL on January 25th, 2001-- five days after taking the > >>>> Oath of Office. > > >>>> Bush's response? He downgraded counter-terrorism from a > >>>> Cabinet-level policy concern,handing it over to deputy secretaries. > > >>>> This means that briefs on counter-terrorism and strategies to > >>>> defeat such organisms as Al Quaeda never reached the Executive > >>>> Office, delayed by months and sometimes permanently, in favor of > >>>> such issues as "missile defense shields", tax reduction and other > >>>> such expensive purely political strategies. > > >>>> (You gotta hand it to Bush, though: he sure likes to spend money > >>>> that isn't his.) > > >>>> Bush continued on in this vein, even when in February, 2001, he > >>>> found out definitively that the Cole had been attacked by Al > >>>> Quaeda. By then though, when he wasn't on vacation, he was deep > >>>> into his plan for convincing the nation to invade Iraq. > >>>> Counter-terrorism grew ever more obscure as a national policy > >>>> concern, right up to 9/11. > > >>>> I don't know why this stuff still surprises me. I've hated Bush and > >>>> his cohorts for a long time for what they've done to the nation. > >>>> You would think I would be too jaded to be surprised anymore. > > >>>> Yet somehow, I still can't believe any President could be this > >>>> shamefully bad and continue in office. > > >>> It's possible Wallace and Clinton conspired to ham > >>> it up for the audience to make them both look good. > > >> Mindless conspiracy theory. > > >> It isnt the first time Slick has done something like that. He > >> got completely rabid when they were more interested in him > >> getting his dick sucked than the world events at that time. > > > Still haven't mastered basic reading skills, have you, Rod? > > Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag. > > > To reiterate: I said it was *possible*; I did not say it was so. > > Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag. > > >>> Stranger things have happened. > > >> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland. > > > Which drug would that be? > > Who knows ? Who cares in spades. You yourself presumed to know, otherwise your "Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland" makes no sense. Reading skills pay, Rod. So does logic. W : )
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1159575206.476182.86950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<bearclaw-E76E02.02334429092006@news.supernews.com> <1159565721.264839.220480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <4o5kemFd1ajnU1@individual.net> <1159573479.901170.28690@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f73f,25ff24737bce8f72 X-Google-Thread: 11474a,25ff24737bce8f72 X-Google-Thread: 106595,25ff24737bce8f72 X-Google-Thread: 107518,25ff24737bce8f72 X-Google-Thread: f6c48,25ff24737bce8f72 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f73f,gid11474a,gid106595,gid107518,gidf6c48,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Wordsmith" <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.consumers,alt.consumers.experiences,ba.consumers,misc.consumers,misc.consumers.frugal-living Subject: Re: Clinton's TV Rage Date: 29 Sep 2006 17:13:26 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 84 Message-ID: <1159575206.476182.86950@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> References: <bearclaw-E76E02.02334429092006@news.supernews.com> <1159565721.264839.220480@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <4o5kemFd1ajnU1@individual.net> <1159573479.901170.28690@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 168.253.19.7 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1159575211 29905 127.0.0.1 (30 Sep 2006 00:13:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:13:31 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4o5qnlFd4dp3U1@individual.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=168.253.19.7; posting-account=QvbdcwwAAADU9SfInrhceZEuUI_nCW4W