🚀 go-pugleaf

Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> Wordsmith <wordsmith@rocketmail.com> wrote
>>>>> bearclaw@cruller.invalid wrote

>>>>>> Who wouldn't be pissed off after all this:

>>>>>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXNCLbsBIfM&eurl=>

>>>>>> It is a 10-minute-long MSNBC investigative report examining
>>>>>> Condoleeza Rice's claim that the incoming Bush administration did
>>>>>> not receive any plan or details from Clinton regarding Al Quaeda
>>>>>> and Osama bin Laden. Its sources are: declassified intelligence
>>>>>> reports, the 9/11 Commission Report, and reports from people who
>>>>>> were there at the time.

>>>>>> Warning: don't bother watching this if you are determined to
>>>>>> ignore the unprincipled depths Condi must plumb to serve
>>>>>> President Bush. For her to lie to us the way she did just days
>>>>>> ago is nothing less than... well, whorish.

>>>>>> The Bush administration got urgent top secret reports about Al
>>>>>> Quaeda and OBL on January 25th, 2001-- five days after taking the
>>>>>> Oath of Office.

>>>>>> Bush's response? He downgraded counter-terrorism from a
>>>>>> Cabinet-level policy concern,handing it over to deputy
>>>>>> secretaries.

>>>>>> This means that briefs on counter-terrorism and strategies to
>>>>>> defeat such organisms as Al Quaeda never reached the Executive
>>>>>> Office, delayed by months and sometimes permanently, in favor of
>>>>>> such issues as "missile defense shields", tax reduction and other
>>>>>> such expensive purely political strategies.

>>>>>> (You gotta hand it to Bush, though: he sure likes to spend money
>>>>>> that isn't his.)

>>>>>> Bush continued on in this vein, even when in February, 2001, he
>>>>>> found out definitively that the Cole had been attacked by Al
>>>>>> Quaeda. By then though, when he wasn't on vacation, he was deep
>>>>>> into his plan for convincing the nation to invade Iraq.
>>>>>> Counter-terrorism grew ever more obscure as a national policy
>>>>>> concern, right up to 9/11.

>>>>>> I don't know why this stuff still surprises me. I've hated Bush
>>>>>> and his cohorts for a long time for what they've done to the
>>>>>> nation. You would think I would be too jaded to be surprised
>>>>>> anymore.

>>>>>> Yet somehow, I still can't believe any President could be this
>>>>>> shamefully bad and continue in office.

>>>>> It's possible Wallace and Clinton conspired to ham
>>>>> it up for the audience to make them both look good.

>>>> Mindless conspiracy theory.

>>>> It isnt the first time Slick has done something like that. He
>>>> got completely rabid when they were more interested in him
>>>> getting his dick sucked than the world events at that time.

>>> Still haven't mastered basic reading skills, have you, Rod?

>> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

>>> To reiterate: I said it was *possible*; I did not say it was so.

>> Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

>>>>> Stranger things have happened.

>>>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland.

>>> Which drug would that be?

>> Who knows ?  Who cares in spades.

> You yourself presumed to know,

Yet another bare faced lie.

> otherwise your "Only in your pathetic little
> drug crazed fantasyland" makes no sense.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.

> Reading skills pay, Rod. So does logic.

Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.