🚀 go-pugleaf

"Furious George" <bugme_69@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158840248.764752.236610@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Anthony Matonak wrote:
> > John wrote:
> > > <bearclaw@cruller.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Useful technique for forcing others to tell you what they think you
want
> > >>to hear:
> > ...<snip link to waterboarding torture technique>...
> > >
> > > Well, we can thank Allah that the brutal Islamic savages don't resort
> > > to such inhuman tactics.  They just deliberately target women and
> > > children in mosques and schools and marketplaces and blow them up with
> > > car bombs.
> > ...<Snip rant about terrorists>...
> >
> > I guess the moral of the story is that if you want to win a war on
> > terror then you gotta break some laws. Of course, you can't actually
> > 'win' such a war because there is always going to be another terrorist,
> > even if you have to train them yourself.
> >
> > Anyone else have more frugal torture techniques? I hear that stun
> > guns are popular method of "questioning" people here in the United
> > States. It's not considered torture unless they die on you, maybe not
> > even then.
>
> Cutting out the middle man is a time-proven cost-savings technique.  In
> the current system, a torturer (middle man#1) tortures some poor sap
> (middle man #2) until he says what Vice-President Cheney (the customer)
> wants to hear.  Why can't Cheney just say whatever he wants to say and
> attribute it to a fictional captured prisoner? This cuts out two middle
> men.
>
> >
> > Anthony
>
Is that what they did to Colin Powell?  The last words he heard were "trust
me, Sadamm has WMD."