Article View: alt.engineering.electrical
Article #11Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician")
From: acs
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:00
49 lines
3559 bytes
3559 bytes
Response. I have read your post and remain unrepentent. If you are a nondegreed PE and you claim to be better trained than a 2.0 engineer are you saying that no one should go to college to learn engineering, that you are better off learning engineering on your own? First: And I have worked with many non degreed PE's who scare me to death because they lack fundamental training in physics, mathematics, strength of materials, statistics, etc. that even a 2.0 new engineer has. Imho a 2.0 degree is better than no degree. Further although someone may pass the PE without a degree I believe they are ignorant (simply because they lack the prerequsite knowledge and scientific training) and are unqualified to be called an engineer. Second: I did not say that I would rather depend on a new 2.0 grad than a nondegreed PE. Imho neither are qualified. However the 2.0 grad can be taught to be a responsible engineer since he has at lease learned the fundamentals, the non-degreed PE can not be taught (without sending him back to college to get a degree) since he does not have the basic skills. To draw an analogy; one cannot read until one knows the alphabet, just as one can not be an engineer until one knows mathematics/physics. Brian Greg Yotz <hoppy6@cadvantage.com> wrote in article <33FB18A8.FF8684A4@cadvantage.com>... > I have worked with several degreed 'engineers' that would scare me to > death to have anything to do anything with safety issues. Just because > you 'earned' a degree from 'some' school doesn't mean your responsible > in any way shape or form. And your saying that you would rather depend > on a new 2.0 gpa 'degreed' engineer than someone who has passed a PE and > has several years of proven ability but doesn't have a degree. > > acs wrote: > > > > > P.S. It is possible for a person to pass the PE test based solely > > on > > work experience, ie there is no requirement for a university degree. > > To me > > this it is a very scary thought someone without a college education > > could > > be responsible for protecting the safety of the public, my family, and > > even > > myself based on their abilty to pass a test. > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bcadf7$c396d260$5ee181ce@snowgoose>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose> <01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose> <33FB18A8.FF8684A4@cadvantage.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 116392,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid116392,public X-Google-Thread: f8a7b,23ef9ba89231145f X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a7b,public X-Google-Thread: 10d137,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10d137,public X-Google-Thread: 14b878,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid14b878,public X-Google-Thread: fbe36,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidfbe36,public X-Google-Thread: f4ca5,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ca5,public X-Google-Thread: f8959,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gidf8959,public X-Google-Thread: 10112a,bbd0ea5f4744528e X-Google-Attributes: gid10112a,public From: "acs" <acs@silverlink.net> Subject: Re: who is the real "engineer"? ( was Re: who can be called "Dr."/"physician") Date: 1997/08/21 Message-ID: <01bcadf7$c396d260$5ee181ce@snowgoose> X-Deja-AN: 265682906 References: <5sdept$7js$1@nnrp1.snfc21.pbi.net> <33EF3AC5.F4C38288@umr.edu> <01bcac52$cdddeb60$66e181ce@snowgoose> <01bcac55$1ce37e80$66e181ce@snowgoose> <33FB18A8.FF8684A4@cadvantage.com> Organization: ACS INC. Newsgroups: alt.engineering.electrical,alt.engr.dynamics,alt.engr.explosives,at.novell,comp.cad.pro-engineer,novell.compuserve.unixware,sci.engr,sci.engr.analysis,sci.engr.biomed,sci.engr.chem,sci.engr.civil